16 U.S.C. § 823 — Repeal of inconsistent laws

submitted 106 years ago by ch. 285 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 57 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section repeals Acts or parts of Acts that conflict with this chapter. It preserves a 1913 Act granting rights-of-way to San Francisco.

All Acts or parts of Acts that conflict with this chapter are repealed. But this does not change or repeal any part of the Act of Congress approved December 19, 1913, that granted certain rights-of-way to the city and county of San Francisco, California.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

All Acts or parts of Acts inconsistent with this chapter are repealed: Provided, That nothing contained herein shall be held or construed to modify or repeal any of the provisions of the Act of Congress approved December 19, 1913, granting certain rights-of-way to the city and county of San Francisco, in the State of California.

Source credit: (June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, § 29, 41 Stat. 1077; renumbered pt. I, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, § 212, 49 Stat. 847.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

1920Enacted · Act of June 10, 1920, ch. 285 · 41 Stat. 1077
1935Amended · Act of Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687 · 49 Stat. 847

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 285 on 1920-06-10.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case