16 U.S.C. § 8463 — Pay-for-performance projects
submitted 1 year ago by Pub. L. 118-234 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 1,703 words · no verdicts yet
The Forest Service can run a pilot program where outside investors or partners pay upfront for recreation projects on national forest land, and get repaid based on how well the project actually performs. Each deal can be worth up to $15,000,000 and last up to 20 years. Independent evaluators check the results and decide how much gets paid.
(a) Definitions. An "independent evaluator" is a person or group — possibly a university — chosen to judge whether a project met its goals and to write the required reports. "National Forest System land" is land in the National Forest System. A "pay-for-performance agreement" is a special mutual-benefit deal (not a normal contract or grant) lasting 1 to 20 years, signed by the Secretary* of Agriculture and either the project's beneficiary or its developer. A "pay-for-performance beneficiary" is a state*, local government, tribe, or nonprofit/for-profit group that either repays an investor's upfront loan based on results, or puts up its own money directly. A "pay-for-performance investor" is a similar group that lends money upfront, expecting a return that depends on the project's results. A "pay-for-performance project" is a project that creates or improves recreation, happens on (or benefits) national forest land, and uses this loaned-or-direct, results-based funding model. A "pay-for-performance project developer" is a nonprofit or for-profit group that helps set up or run these deals. "Project outcome" is a measurable, beneficial result — economic, environmental, or social — spelled out in the agreement.
(b) Establishment of pilot program. The Secretary of Agriculture must create a pilot program to carry out one or more pay-for-performance projects.
(c) Pay-for-performance projects. Using money from an agreement or from regular appropriations, a project can be carried out by the Secretary, or by a project developer or other third party if the Secretary approves and it follows the law. The project must fit any applicable land management plan. The United States owns any new improvements built on national forest land; doing the project does not change who owns existing federally owned improvements or the land itself. Carrying out project actions does not give any party new legal rights. Before approving a project, the Secretary must consider and try to avoid conflicts, including economic competition, with any existing authorized use.
(d) Project agreements. Despite two older laws that might otherwise apply, the Secretary may sign pay-for-performance agreements under which a beneficiary, investor, or developer agrees to help pay for or finance a project. No single project agreement can be worth more than $15,000,000. The agreement must state what amounts the beneficiary or developer will pay the investor or developer once an independent evaluator determines how much of the project outcome was actually achieved. Those amounts must be based on each party's contribution and the benefits the outcome produced, and set as a percentage of the outcome's estimated value, of cost savings, of extra revenue, or of the project's cost. The Forest Service itself may only help fund a project — capped at 50% of total project cost — if the Secretary shows the project would save the government money, or speed up or expand work the Secretary already planned to do. Any funds the Secretary receives under this program go into a separate Treasury account, reserved for pay-for-performance projects and available without further appropriation. Every agreement must include a plan for maintaining improvements after the project is done, and must name who is responsible for decommissioning improvements — whether at the end of their useful life, if they stop serving their purpose, or if the project fails. The Secretary may unilaterally end an agreement, in whole or part, for any program year after giving each party notice.
(e) Independent evaluations. An independent evaluator must send the Secretary and every party to the agreement: a progress report summarizing how each outcome is coming along, due within 2 years of signing and at least every 2 years after; and, before each scheduled payment date, a report on whether that payment should be made and why the outcome was or wasn't achieved. Within 180 days after a project finishes, the evaluator must send a final report evaluating each outcome, determining whether it was met, and stating how much was actually paid.
(f) Additional Forest Service-provided assistance. The Secretary may give technical help with planning, permitting, site prep, and design. Subject to available funding, the Secretary may also hire a contractor to study a project's feasibility, help develop or evaluate a project or agreement, or help with environmental analysis.
(g) Savings clause. Before signing a pay-for-performance agreement, the Secretary must first approve the standard formal decision document for any activities the project involves on national forest land.
(h) Duration of pilot program. The authority to sign new pay-for-performance agreements ends 7 years after January 4, 2025. That deadline does not affect any agreement the Secretary already signed before then.
In this section:
The term “independent evaluator” means an individual or entity, including an institution of higher education, that is selected by the pay-for-performance beneficiary and pay-for-performance investor, as applicable, or by the pay-for-performance project developer, in consultation with the Secretary* of Agriculture, to make the determinations and prepare the reports required under subsection (e).
The term “National Forest System land” means land in the National Forest System (as defined in section 1609(a) of this title).
The term “pay-for-performance agreement” means a mutual benefit agreement (excluding a procurement contract, grant agreement, or cooperative agreement described in chapter 63 of title 31) for a pay-for-performance project—
with a term of—
not less than 1 year; and
not more than 20 years; and
that is executed, in accordance with applicable law, by—
the Secretary of Agriculture; and
a pay-for-performance beneficiary or pay-for-performance project developer.
The term “pay-for-performance beneficiary” means a State* or local government, an Indian Tribe*, or a nonprofit or for-profit organization that—
repays capital loaned upfront by a pay-for-performance investor, based on a project outcome specified in a pay-for-performance agreement; or
provides capital directly for costs associated with a pay-for-performance project.
The term “pay-for-performance investor” means a State or local government, an Indian Tribe, or a nonprofit or for-profit organization that provides upfront loaned capital for a pay-for-performance project with the expectation of a financial return dependent on a project outcome.
The term “pay-for-performance project” means a project that—
would provide or enhance a recreational opportunity;
is conducted on—
National Forest System land; or
other land, if the activities would benefit National Forest System land (including a recreational use of National Forest System land); and
would use an innovative funding or financing model that leverages—
loaned capital from a pay-for-performance investor to cover upfront costs associated with a pay-for-performance project, with the loaned capital repaid by a pay-for-performance beneficiary at a rate of return dependent on a project outcome, as measured by an independent evaluator; or
capital directly from a pay-for-performance beneficiary to support costs associated with a pay-for-performance project in an amount based on an anticipated project outcome.
The term “pay-for-performance project developer” means a nonprofit or for-profit organization that serves as an intermediary to assist in developing or implementing a pay-for-performance agreement or a pay-for-performance project.
The term “project outcome” means a measurable, beneficial result (whether economic, environmental, or social) that is attributable to a pay-for-performance project and described in a pay-for-performance agreement.
The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a pilot program in accordance with this section to carry out 1 or more pay-for-performance projects.
Using funds made available through a pay-for-performance agreement or appropriations, all or any portion of a pay-for-performance project may be implemented by—
the Secretary of Agriculture; or
a pay-for-performance project developer or a third party, subject to the conditions that—
the Secretary of Agriculture shall approve the implementation by the pay-for-performance project developer or third party; and
the implementation is in accordance with applicable law.
A pay-for-performance project carried out under this section shall be consistent with any applicable land management plan developed under section 1604 of this title.
The United States shall have title to any improvements installed on National Forest System land as part of a pay-for-performance project.
Investing in, conducting, or completing a pay-for-performance project on National Forest System land shall not affect the title of the United States to—
any federally owned improvements involved in the pay-for-performance project; or
the underlying land.
The carrying out of any action for a pay-for-performance project does not provide any right to any party to a pay-for-performance agreement.
Before approving a pay-for-performance project under this section, the Secretary of Agriculture shall consider and seek to avoid potential conflicts (including economic competition) with any existing written authorized use.
Notwithstanding the Act of June 30, 1914 (38 Stat. 430, chapter 131; 16 U.S.C. 498), or subtitle C of title XX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397n et seq.), in carrying out the pilot program under this section, the Secretary of Agriculture may enter into a pay-for-performance agreement under which a pay-for-performance beneficiary, pay-for-performance investor, or pay-for-performance project developer agrees to pay for or finance all or part of a pay-for-performance project.
The Secretary of Agriculture may not enter into a pay-for-performance agreement under the pilot program under this section for a pay-for-performance project valued at more than $15,000,000.
A pay-for-performance agreement shall specify the amounts that a pay-for-performance beneficiary or a pay-for-performance project developer agrees to pay to a pay-for-performance investor or a pay-for-performance project developer, as appropriate, in the event of an independent evaluator determining pursuant to subsection (e) the degree to which a project outcome has been achieved.
An amount described in subparagraph (A) shall be—
based on—
the respective contributions of the parties under the pay-for-performance agreement; and
the economic, environmental, or social benefits derived from the project outcomes; and
a percentage of the estimated value of a project outcome;
a percentage of the estimated cost savings to the pay-for-performance beneficiary or the Secretary of Agriculture derived from a project outcome;
a percentage of the enhanced revenue to the pay-for-performance beneficiary or the Secretary of Agriculture derived from a project outcome; or
a percentage of the cost of the pay-for-performance project.
Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Agriculture may contribute funding for a pay-for-performance project only if—
the Secretary of Agriculture demonstrates that—
the pay-for-performance project would provide a cost savings to the United States;
the funding would accelerate the pace of implementation of an activity previously planned to be completed by the Secretary of Agriculture; or
the funding would accelerate the scale of implementation of an activity previously planned to be completed by the Secretary of Agriculture; and
the contribution of the Secretary of Agriculture has a value that is not more than 50 percent of the total cost of the pay-for-performance project.
Any funds received by the Secretary of Agriculture under subsection (c)(1)—
shall be retained in a separate fund in the Treasury to be used solely for pay-for-performance projects; and
shall remain available until expended and without further appropriation.
A pay-for-performance agreement shall—
include a plan for maintaining any capital improvement constructed as part of a pay-for-performance project after the date on which the pay-for-performance project is completed; and
specify the party that will be responsible for decommissioning the improvements associated with the pay-for-performance project—
at the end of the useful life of the improvements;
if the improvements no longer serve the purpose for which the improvements were developed; or
if the pay-for-performance project fails.
The Secretary of Agriculture may unilaterally terminate a pay-for-performance agreement, in whole or in part, for any program year beginning after the program year during which the Secretary of Agriculture provides to each party to the pay-for-performance agreement a notice of the termination.
An independent evaluator shall submit to the Secretary of Agriculture and each party to the applicable pay-for-performance agreement—
by not later than 2 years after the date on which the pay-for-performance agreement is executed, and at least once every 2 years thereafter, a written report that summarizes the progress that has been made in achieving each project outcome; and
before the first scheduled date for a payment described in subsection (d)(3)(A), and each subsequent date for payment, a written report that—
summarizes the results of the evaluation conducted by the independent evaluator to determine whether a payment should be made pursuant to the pay-for-performance agreement; and
analyzes the reasons why a project outcome was achieved or was not achieved.
Not later than 180 days after the date on which a pay-for-performance project is completed, the independent evaluator shall submit to the Secretary of Agriculture and each party to the pay-for-performance agreement a written report that includes, with respect to the period covered by the report—
an evaluation of the effects of the pay-for-performance project with respect to each project outcome;
a determination of whether the pay-for-performance project has met each project outcome; and
the amount of the payments made for the pay-for-performance project pursuant to subsection (d)(3)(A).
The Secretary of Agriculture may provide technical assistance to facilitate pay-for-performance project development, such as planning, permitting, site preparation, and design work.
Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Agriculture may hire a contractor—
to conduct a feasibility analysis of a proposed pay-for-performance project;
to assist in the development, implementation, or evaluation of a proposed pay-for-performance project or a pay-for-performance agreement; or
to assist with an environmental analysis of a proposed pay-for-performance project.
The Secretary of Agriculture shall approve a record of decision, decision notice, or decision memo for any activities to be carried out on National Forest System land as part of a pay-for-performance project before the Secretary of Agriculture may enter into a pay-for-performance agreement involving the applicable pay-for-performance project.
The authority to enter into a pay-for-performance agreement under this section terminates on the date that is 7 years after January 4, 2025.
Nothing in paragraph (1) affects any pay-for-performance project agreement entered into by the Secretary of Agriculture under this section before the date described in that paragraph.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 118–234, title I, § 155, Jan. 4, 2025, 138 Stat. 2871.)
- 2025Enacted · Pub. L. 118-234 · 138 Stat. 2871
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 118-234 on 2025-01-04.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case