17 U.S.C. § 107 — Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-553 to r/title-17-COPYRIGHTS · 175 words · no verdicts yet
Copying a copyrighted work for fair use isn't copyright infringement, even though sections 106 and 106A normally control copying. Fair use covers things like criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research. Courts weigh the use's purpose, the work's nature, how much was used, and the effect on the work's market.
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies* or phonorecords* or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
the nature of the copyrighted work;
the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L. 102–492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)
- 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-553 · 90 Stat. 2546
- 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-650 · 104 Stat. 5132
- 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-492 · 106 Stat. 3145
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-553 on 1976-10-19.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case