ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

17 U.S.C. § 113Scope of exclusive rights in pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works

submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-553 to r/title-17-COPYRIGHTS · 624 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Copyright owners of pictures, graphics, and sculptures can control reproducing their work on any kind of object. But this doesn't give extra rights over "useful articles" shaped like the artwork, and it doesn't block ads or news photos of mass-produced useful items. Special rules protect an artist's rights when their work becomes part of a building.

(a) Subject to (b) and (c), the exclusive right to reproduce a copyrighted pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work in copies under section 106 includes the right to reproduce it in or on any kind of article, whether useful or not. (b) This title does not give the owner of copyright in a work portraying a "useful article" any greater or lesser rights over making, distributing, or displaying that useful article than the law — title 17, common law, or state law, as it stood on December 31, 1977 — already gave, as courts have applied and interpreted it. (c) If a useful article has been lawfully reproduced and offered for sale or other distribution to the public, the copyright does not stop anyone from making, distributing, or displaying pictures or photographs of that article in ads or commentary about its distribution or display, or in news reports. (d)(1) If (A) a work of visual art has been built into a building in a way that removing it would destroy, distort, mutilate, or otherwise modify the work, as described in section 106A(a)(3), and (B) the artist agreed to the installation — either before the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990's effective date, or afterward in a written agreement signed by both the building's owner and the artist that specifically says removal may destroy, distort, mutilate, or modify the work — then the artist's rights under section 106A(a)(2) and (3) do not apply. (2) If a building's owner wants to remove a work of visual art that is part of the building and that CAN be removed without destroying, distorting, mutilating, or modifying it, the artist's rights under section 106A(a)(2) and (3) still apply, unless (A) the owner made a diligent, good-faith attempt, without success, to notify the artist of the planned removal; or (B) the owner did give written notice, and the artist, within 90 days of receiving it, failed to either remove the work or pay for its removal. An owner is presumed to have made a diligent, good-faith attempt if they sent the notice by registered mail to the artist's most recent address on file with the Register of Copyrights. If the work is removed at the artist's expense, that copy of the work belongs to the artist. (3) The Register of Copyrights must set up a system letting an artist whose visual-art work has become part of a building record their identity and address with the Copyright Office, and must set up procedures for artists to update that information and for building owners to record evidence of their efforts to comply with this subsection.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

Subject to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the exclusive right to reproduce a copyrighted pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work in copies under section 106 includes the right to reproduce the work in or on any kind of article, whether useful or otherwise.

(b)

This title does not afford, to the owner of copyright in a work that portrays a useful article as such, any greater or lesser rights with respect to the making, distribution, or display of the useful article so portrayed than those afforded to such works under the law, whether title 17 or the common law or statutes of a State, in effect on December 31, 1977, as held applicable and construed by a court in an action brought under this title.

(c)

In the case of a work lawfully reproduced in useful articles that have been offered for sale or other distribution to the public, copyright does not include any right to prevent the making, distribution, or display of pictures or photographs of such articles in connection with advertisements or commentaries related to the distribution or display of such articles, or in connection with news reports.

(d)
(1)

In a case in which—

(A)

a work of visual art has been incorporated in or made part of a building in such a way that removing the work from the building will cause the destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification of the work as described in section 106A(a)(3), and

(B)

the author consented to the installation of the work in the building either before the effective date set forth in section 610(a) of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, or in a written instrument executed on or after such effective date that is signed by the owner of the building and the author and that specifies that installation of the work may subject the work to destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification, by reason of its removal,

then the rights conferred by paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 106A(a) shall not apply.

(2)

If the owner of a building wishes to remove a work of visual art which is a part of such building and which can be removed from the building without the destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other modification of the work as described in section 106A(a)(3), the author’s rights under paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 106A(a) shall apply unless—

(A)

the owner has made a diligent, good faith attempt without success to notify the author of the owner’s intended action affecting the work of visual art, or

(B)

the owner did provide such notice in writing and the person so notified failed, within 90 days after receiving such notice, either to remove the work or to pay for its removal.

For purposes of subparagraph (A), an owner shall be presumed to have made a diligent, good faith attempt to send notice if the owner sent such notice by registered mail to the author at the most recent address of the author that was recorded with the Register of Copyrights pursuant to paragraph (3). If the work is removed at the expense of the author, title to that copy of the work shall be deemed to be in the author.

(3)

The Register of Copyrights shall establish a system of records whereby any author of a work of visual art that has been incorporated in or made part of a building, may record his or her identity and address with the Copyright Office. The Register shall also establish procedures under which any such author may update the information so recorded, and procedures under which owners of buildings may record with the Copyright Office evidence of their efforts to comply with this subsection.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2560; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 604, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5130.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-553 · 90 Stat. 2560
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-650 · 104 Stat. 5130

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-553 on 1976-10-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case