17 U.S.C. § 204 — Execution of transfers of copyright ownership
submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-553 to r/title-17-COPYRIGHTS · 145 words · no verdicts yet
A copyright transfer must be in writing and signed by the owner to be valid. This doesn't apply to transfers required by law, like inheritance. A notarized certificate isn't required, but it helps prove the transfer happened.
A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner’s duly authorized agent.
A certificate of acknowledgement is not required for the validity of a transfer, but is prima facie evidence of the execution of the transfer if—
in the case of a transfer executed in the United States, the certificate is issued by a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States; or
in the case of a transfer executed in a foreign country, the certificate is issued by a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, or by a person authorized to administer oaths whose authority is proved by a certificate of such an officer.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2570.)
- 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-553 · 90 Stat. 2570
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-553 on 1976-10-19.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case