18 U.S.C. § 158 — Designation of United States attorneys and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to address abusive reaffirmations of debt and materially fraudulent statements in bankruptcy schedules
submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 109-8 to r/title-18-CRIMES-AND-CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE · 204 words · no verdicts yet
The Attorney General picks specific prosecutors and FBI agents to handle bankruptcy fraud cases. They focus on abusive debt reaffirmations and false bankruptcy statements. Bankruptcy courts must have a system for referring these cases to them.
The Attorney General of the United States shall designate the individuals described in subsection (b) to have primary responsibility in carrying out enforcement activities in addressing violations of section 152 or 157 relating to abusive reaffirmations of debt. In addition to addressing the violations referred to in the preceding sentence, the individuals described under subsection (b) shall address violations of section 152 or 157 relating to materially fraudulent statements in bankruptcy schedules that are intentionally false or intentionally misleading.
The individuals referred to in subsection (a) are—
the United States attorney for each judicial district of the United States; and
an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for each field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Each United States attorney designated under this section shall, in addition to any other responsibilities, have primary responsibility for carrying out the duties of a United States attorney under section 3057.
The bankruptcy courts shall establish procedures for referring any case that may contain a materially fraudulent statement in a bankruptcy schedule to the individuals designated under this section.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 109–8, title II, § 203(b)(1), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 49.)
- 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 109-8 · 119 Stat. 49
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-8 on 2005-04-20.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case