18 U.S.C. § 17 — Insanity defense
submitted 42 years ago by Pub. L. 98-473 to r/title-18-CRIMES-AND-CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE · 86 words · no verdicts yet
A defendant can use insanity as a defense only if, because of a severe mental disease or defect, they could not understand their actions were wrong when they committed the crime. Having a mental disease alone is not a defense by itself. The defendant must prove insanity with clear and convincing evidence.
It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under any Federal statute that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense.
The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 402(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2057, § 20; renumbered § 17, Pub. L. 99–646, § 34(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3599.)
- 1984Enacted · Pub. L. 98-473 · 98 Stat. 2057
- 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-646 · 100 Stat. 3599
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 98-473 on 1984-10-12.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case