ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

19 U.S.C. § 3731 — Sense of the Congress regarding comprehensive debt relief for the world’s poorest countries

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-200 to r/title-19-CUSTOMS-DUTIES · 449 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section records Congress’s findings about debt burdens and the HIPC Initiative. It states Congress’s view on comprehensive debt relief’s design and conditions.

(a) Congress finds that external debt impedes growth and poverty reduction; earlier loan rescheduling and limited reductions did not stop poor-country debt from exceeding repayment capacity; and in 1997 the Group of Seven, World Bank, and IMF adopted HIPC, promising coordinated bilateral and multilateral reduction to sustainable levels. HIPC reforms address country conditions, forgiven amounts, and use of savings so it achieves growth and poverty reduction. (b) Congress believes Congress and the President should promptly work with the international community for comprehensive relief promoting growth and poverty reduction; relief should strengthen the private sector, trade, investment, free markets, and broad growth; support poverty-reduction policies including education, health, AIDS, clean water, and environmental protection; be transparent, broadly participatory, and responsive to country circumstances; no country should receive debt relief if it does not cooperate with the United States on terrorism or narcotics enforcement, grossly violates human rights, is in conflict, or spends excessively on the military; and the IMF must use its own resources without putting gold on the open market or harming gold’s price.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Findings

Congress makes the following findings:

(1)

The burden of external debt has become a major impediment to economic growth and poverty reduction in many of the world’s poorest countries.

(2)

Until recently, the United States Government and other official creditors sought to address this problem by rescheduling loans and in some cases providing limited debt reduction.

(3)

Despite such efforts, the cumulative debt of many of the world’s poorest countries continued to grow beyond their capacity to repay.

(4)

In 1997, the Group of Seven, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund adopted the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC), a commitment by the international community that all multilateral and bilateral creditors, acting in a coordinated and concerted fashion, would reduce poor country debt to a sustainable level.

(5)

The HIPC Initiative is currently undergoing reforms to address concerns raised about country conditionality, the amount of debt forgiven, and the allocation of savings realized through the debt forgiveness program to ensure that the Initiative accomplishes the goals of economic growth and poverty alleviation in the world’s poorest countries.

(b) Sense of the Congress

It is the sense of the Congress that—

(1)

Congress and the President should work together, without undue delay and in concert with the international community, to make comprehensive debt relief available to the world’s poorest countries in a manner that promotes economic growth and poverty alleviation;

(2)

this program of bilateral and multilateral debt relief should be designed to strengthen and expand the private sector, encourage increased trade and investment, support the development of free markets, and promote broad-scale economic growth in beneficiary countries;

(3)

this program of debt relief should also support the adoption of policies to alleviate poverty and to ensure that benefits are shared widely among the population, such as through initiatives to advance education, improve health, combat AIDS, and promote clean water and environmental protection;

(4)

these debt relief agreements should be designed and implemented in a transparent manner and with the broad participation of the citizenry of the debtor country and should ensure that country circumstances are adequately taken into account;

(5)

no country should receive the benefits of debt relief if that country does not cooperate with the United States on terrorism or narcotics enforcement, is a gross violator of the human rights of its citizens, or is engaged in conflict or spends excessively on its military; and

(6)

in order to prevent adverse impact on a key industry in many developing countries, the International Monetary Fund must mobilize its own resources for providing debt relief to eligible countries without allowing gold to reach the open market, or otherwise adversely affecting the market price of gold.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–200, title I, § 121, May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 267.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-200 · 114 Stat. 267

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-200 on 2000-05-18.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case