ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 303Dual compensation

submitted 62 years ago by Pub. L. 88-652 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 88 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law sets pay for House employees who hold more than one civilian job at once and are covered by certain House pay schedules. Their base pay rate is set so that, once other authorized House pay increases are added, it matches or comes closest to their normal pay under that schedule.

This section has no lettered subsections. It deals with House of Representatives employees who are covered by the House Employees Schedule or the House Wage Schedule, and who also get paid for more than one civilian office or job at the same time. For any employee covered by one of these schedules, their basic pay rate is set at whatever rate, once you add the extra pay increases currently authorized by law for House employees generally, equals — or comes as close as possible to equaling — the yearly pay rate that employee is supposed to get under that schedule.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

For the purposes of applicable law relating to the payment to any employee subject to the House Employees Schedule or the House Wage Schedule of compensation from more than one civilian office or position, the rate of basic compensation of each employee subject to any such schedule shall be held and considered to be that rate which, when increased by additional compensation then currently authorized by law for House employees generally, equals or most nearly equals the per annum rate of compensation of such employee under such schedule.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 88–652, § 14, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1084.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1964Enacted · Pub. L. 88-652 · 78 Stat. 1084

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 88-652 on 1964-10-13.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case