ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 623Continuing study of additional budget reform proposals

submitted 52 years ago by Pub. L. 93-344 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 179 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The Committees on the Budget of the House of Representatives and the Senate shall study on a continuing basis proposals designed to improve and facilitate methods of congressional budgetmaking. The proposals to be studied shall include, but are not limited to, proposals for—

(1)

improving the information base required for determining the effectiveness of new programs by such means as pilot testing, survey research, and other experimental and analytical techniques;

(2)

improving analytical and systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of existing programs;

(3)

establishing maximum and minimum time limitations for program authorization; and

(4)

developing techniques of human resource accounting and other means of providing noneconomic as well as economic evaluation measures.

(b)

The Committee on the Budget of each House shall, from time to time, report to its House the results of the study carried on by it under subsection (a), together with its recommendations.

(c)

Nothing in this section shall preclude studies to improve the budgetary process by any other committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate or any joint committee of the Congress.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 93–344, title VII, § 703, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 326.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1974Enacted · Pub. L. 93-344 · 88 Stat. 326

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 93-344 on 1974-07-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case