ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 661bOMB and CBO analysis, coordination, and review

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 93-344 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 270 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section assigns responsibility for credit-program cost estimates to the OMB Director and requires coordination with the Congressional Budget Office. It also requires improving estimates and reporting on administrative costs.

(a) In general. For the executive branch, the Director is responsible for coordinating estimates required by this subchapter and must consult agencies administering direct-loan or guarantee programs. (b) Delegation. The Director may authorize agencies to estimate costs. Any delegation must use written guidelines, regulations, or criteria consistent with this subchapter’s definitions. (c) Coordination with CBO. When developing estimation guidelines, regulations, or criteria for Federal agencies, the Director must consult the CBO Director. (d) Improving estimates. The two Directors must coordinate development of more accurate historical-performance data. Each must annually review outstanding direct loans and guarantees to improve cost estimates. OMB and CBO must have access to agency data that may help develop or improve estimates. (e) Historical costs. To the extent possible, the Director must review historical data and develop the best estimates for adjustments converting aggregate historical budget data to credit-reform accounting. (f) Administrative costs. By January 31, 1992, each Director must analyze and report to Congress on differences in long-term administrative costs for credit programs and grant programs. The reports must recommend needed changes to how credit-reform accounting treats administrative costs.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

For the executive branch, the Director shall be responsible for coordinating the estimates required by this subchapter. The Director shall consult with the agencies that administer direct loan or loan guarantee programs.

(b) Delegation

The Director may delegate to agencies authority to make estimates of costs. The delegation of authority shall be based upon written guidelines, regulations, or criteria consistent with the definitions in this subchapter.

(c) Coordination with Congressional Budget Office

In developing estimation guidelines, regulations, or criteria to be used by Federal agencies, the Director shall consult with the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

(d) Improving cost estimates

The Director and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall coordinate the development of more accurate data on historical performance of direct loan and loan guarantee programs. They shall annually review the performance of outstanding direct loans and loan guarantees to improve estimates of costs. The Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office shall have access to all agency data that may facilitate the development and improvement of estimates of costs.

(e) Historical credit program costs

The Director shall review, to the extent possible, historical data and develop the best possible estimates of adjustments that would convert aggregate historical budget data to credit reform accounting.

(f) Administrative costs

The Director and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall each analyze and report to Congress on differences in long-term administrative costs for credit programs versus grant programs by January 31, 1992. Their reports shall recommend to Congress any changes, if necessary, in the treatment of administrative costs under credit reform accounting.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 93–344, title V, § 503, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, § 13201(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–611.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 93-344 · 104 Stat. 1388

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 93-344 on 1990-11-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case