ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–1Dispute resolution

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 105-115 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 142 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

When the FDA and a drug or device sponsor disagree on the science behind a legal duty, and no rule already offers a way to get it reviewed, the Secretary must create a review procedure. That procedure can include review by a scientific advisory panel or committee, and any review must happen promptly.

Sometimes the FDA and a drug or device sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer disagree about the science behind a legal requirement under this Act or under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act. This section covers what happens when no existing law or regulation — including a regulation issued under that Act — already gives that person a way to get the disagreement reviewed. In that situation, the Secretary must write a regulation setting up a review procedure. The sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer can use it to ask for a review of the scientific controversy. That review can include a look by a scientific advisory panel, described in section 355(n), or an advisory committee, described in section 360e(g)(2)(B). Any review requested under this procedure must happen in a timely manner. The Secretary had to issue the regulations creating this procedure within one year of November 21, 1997.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

If, regarding an obligation concerning drugs or devices under this Act or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], there is a scientific controversy between the Secretary and a person who is a sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer and no specific provision of the Act involved, including a regulation promulgated under such Act, provides a right of review of the matter in controversy, the Secretary shall, by regulation, establish a procedure under which such sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer may request a review of such controversy, including a review by an appropriate scientific advisory panel described in section 355(n) of this title or an advisory committee described in section 360e(g)(2)(B) of this title. Any such review shall take place in a timely manner. The Secretary shall promulgate such regulations within 1 year after November 21, 1997.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 562, as added Pub. L. 105–115, title IV, § 404, Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2368.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 105-115 · 111 Stat. 2368

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-115 on 1938-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case