ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–8Consultation with external experts on rare diseases, targeted therapies, and genetic targeting of treatments

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 112-144 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 802 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law requires the FDA to consult outside experts on rare diseases and gene-targeted drugs, to help review new drug and biologic applications more efficiently. The FDA keeps a list of qualified experts, can treat them as special government employees, and must protect any trade secrets shared with them. It doesn't create a right to a consultation and can't be used to delay a drug's review.

(a) In general To help the FDA review new drugs and biological products for rare diseases, and drugs and biological products that are genetically targeted, more efficiently: (1) Consultation with stakeholders. Following goals set out in the PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals letters described in section 101(b) of the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012, the Secretary must make sure there are chances, at appropriate times, to consult with stakeholders on the topics listed in subsection (b). (2) Consultation with external experts. (A) The Secretary must build and keep a list of outside experts qualified — because of their special knowledge — to advise on rare disease issues, including the topics in subsection (b). The Secretary may consult them on a specific regulatory question about reviewing rare-disease or gene-targeted drugs and biologics, but only when the FDA itself lacks the needed scientific, medical, or technical expertise and the outside expert can supply it. (B) "External experts" means people with scientific or medical training in one or more rare diseases that the Secretary doesn't have in-house. (b) Topics for consultation Consultations under this section can cover: (1) rare diseases generally; (2) how severe a rare disease is; (3) the unmet medical need tied to it; (4) whether people with the disease are willing and able to join clinical trials; (5) weighing the benefits and risks of therapies for it; (6) how to design clinical trials for rare-disease populations and subgroups; (7) the makeup and clinical description of the patient population; and (8) the science of studying small populations. (c) Classification as special government employees Experts consulted under this section can be treated as "special government employees," as section 202 of title 18 defines that term. (d) Protection of confidential information and trade secrets (1) Rule of construction. This section does not weaken the existing laws, regulations, and policies protecting confidential commercial or trade secret information, or other information exempt from disclosure under section 552(b) of title 5, as those protections applied to consultations with outside individuals and organizations before July 9, 2012. (2) Consent required for disclosure. The Secretary cannot share confidential commercial or trade secret information with an expert consulted under this section without the sponsor's written consent — unless that expert is a special government employee, as defined in section 202 of title 18, or unless some other law authorizes the disclosure. (e) Other consultation Nothing here limits the Secretary's ability to consult with individuals and organizations in ways that were already allowed before July 9, 2012. (f) No right or obligation (1) No right to consultation. This section doesn't give anyone a legal right to a consultation, and doesn't force the Secretary to meet with any particular expert or stakeholder. (2) No altering of goals. It doesn't change the goals and procedures already agreed to in the letters described in section 101(b) of the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012. (3) No change to number of review cycles. It's not meant to increase the number of review cycles beyond what applied before July 9, 2012. (g) No delay in product review (1) In general. Before consulting an external expert about an investigational new drug application under section 355(i), a new drug application under section 355(b), or a biologics license application under section 262 of title 42, the Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research or the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or the relevant Division Director, must first decide either (A) that the consultation will help the FDA finish its review and will address specific problems with the application, or (B) that the sponsor itself agreed to the consultation. (2) Limitation. This requirement only applies when the consultation happens solely under this section's authority — not when it's done under some other legal authority.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

For the purpose of promoting the efficiency of and informing the review by the Food and Drug Administration of new drugs and biological products for rare diseases and drugs and biological products that are genetically targeted, the following shall apply:

(1) Consultation with stakeholders

Consistent with sections X.C and IX.E.4 of the PDUFA Reauthorization Performance Goals and Procedures Fiscal Years 2013 through 2017, as referenced in the letters described in section 101(b) of the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012, the Secretary shall ensure that opportunities exist, at a time the Secretary determines appropriate, for consultations with stakeholders on the topics described in subsection (b).

(2) Consultation with external experts
(A) In general

The Secretary shall develop and maintain a list of external experts who, because of their special expertise, are qualified to provide advice on rare disease issues, including topics described in subsection (b). The Secretary may, when appropriate to address a specific regulatory question, consult such external experts on issues related to the review of new drugs and biological products for rare diseases and drugs and biological products that are genetically targeted, including the topics described in subsection (b), when such consultation is necessary because the Secretary lacks the specific scientific, medical, or technical expertise necessary for the performance of the Secretary’s regulatory responsibilities and the necessary expertise can be provided by the external experts.

(B) External experts

For purposes of subparagraph (A), external experts are individuals who possess scientific or medical training that the Secretary lacks with respect to one or more rare diseases.

(b) Topics for consultation

Topics for consultation pursuant to this section may include—

(1)

rare diseases;

(2)

the severity of rare diseases;

(3)

the unmet medical need associated with rare diseases;

(4)

the willingness and ability of individuals with a rare disease to participate in clinical trials;

(5)

an assessment of the benefits and risks of therapies to treat rare diseases;

(6)

the general design of clinical trials for rare disease populations and subpopulations;

(7)

the demographics and the clinical description of patient populations; and

(8)

the science of small population studies.

(c) Classification as special government employees

The external experts who are consulted under this section may be considered special government employees, as defined under section 202 of title 18.

(d) Protection of confidential information and trade secrets
(1) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the protections offered by laws, regulations, and policies governing disclosure of confidential commercial or trade secret information, and any other information exempt from disclosure pursuant to section 552(b) of title 5 as such provisions would be applied to consultation with individuals and organizations prior to July 9, 2012.

(2) Consent required for disclosure

The Secretary shall not disclose confidential commercial or trade secret information to an expert consulted under this section without the written consent of the sponsor unless the expert is a special government employee (as defined under section 202 of title 18) or the disclosure is otherwise authorized by law.

(e) Other consultation

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of the Secretary to consult with individuals and organizations as authorized prior to July 9, 2012.

(f) No right or obligation
(1) No right to consultation

Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a legal right for a consultation on any matter or require the Secretary to meet with any particular expert or stakeholder.

(2) No altering of goals

Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter agreed upon goals and procedures identified in the letters described in section 101(b) of the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012.

(3) No change to number of review cycles

Nothing in this section is intended to increase the number of review cycles as in effect before July 9, 2012.

(g) No delay in product review
(1) In general

Prior to a consultation with an external expert, as described in this section, relating to an investigational new drug application under section 355(i) of this title, a new drug application under section 355(b) of this title, or a biologics license application under section 262 of title 42, the Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research or the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (or appropriate Division Director), as appropriate, shall determine that—

(A)

such consultation will—

(i)

facilitate the Secretary’s ability to complete the Secretary’s review; and

(ii)

address outstanding deficiencies in the application; or

(B)

the sponsor authorized such consultation.

(2) Limitation

The requirements of this subsection shall apply only in instances where the consultation is undertaken solely under the authority of this section. The requirements of this subsection shall not apply to any consultation initiated under any other authority.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 569, as added Pub. L. 112–144, title IX, § 903, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1088; amended Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, § 3101(a)(2)(O), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1154; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title III, § 3202(e), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5812.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 112-144 · 126 Stat. 1088
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-255 · 130 Stat. 1154
  • 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-328 · 136 Stat. 5812

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 112-144 on 1938-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case