ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 387rDrug products used to treat tobacco dependence

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 111-31 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 271 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The FDA must consider fast-tracking smoking-cessation products and longer use of nicotine replacement products. It must also review evidence for new uses, such as craving relief. Within three years, the FDA must report to Congress on regulating innovative tobacco-dependence products.

(a) The Secretary must do three things if a drug company asks. First, the Secretary must think about labeling smoking-cessation products as "fast track" products. This includes nicotine replacement products. That label can speed up research and approval under section 356. Second, the Secretary must think about letting people use nicotine replacement products longer. These include patches, gum, and lozenges, used to treat tobacco dependence. Third, the Secretary must look at proof for new uses of these products. This includes easing cravings or stopping relapse. (b) Within three years, the Secretary must send Congress a report. The report covers new products for tobacco dependence. Before writing it, the Secretary must talk with science, medical, and public health experts. This includes federal agencies and outside groups. It also includes the Institute of Medicine and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. The report must study how to regulate and support new nicotine-based and non-nicotine products. The goal is public health, in three ways. These are helping people fully quit tobacco, cutting how much tobacco people use, and cutting harm from tobacco use that goes on. The report must also give the Secretary's ideas. These ideas should cover how the FDA can share news about these products better within its own offices. They should also cover sharing with the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other agencies.

facts

- Placement: Codified at 21 U.S.C. § 387r, addressing drug products used to treat tobacco dependence. - Length: Approximately 271 words, comprising two subsections (a) and (b). - Origin: Enacted as § 918 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (June 25, 1938, ch. 675), added by Pub. L. 111–31, div. A, title I, § 101(b)(3), on June 22, 2009 (123 Stat. 1825). - Amendment history: Source credit reflects a single amendment count, indicating no subsequent amendments since original enactment.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Secretary shall—

(1)

at the request of the applicant, consider designating products for smoking cessation, including nicotine replacement products as fast track research and approval products within the meaning of section 356 of this title;

(2)

consider approving the extended use of nicotine replacement products (such as nicotine patches, nicotine gum, and nicotine lozenges) for the treatment of tobacco dependence; and

(3)

review and consider the evidence for additional indications for nicotine replacement products, such as for craving relief or relapse prevention.

(b) Report on innovative products
(1) In general

Not later than 3 years after June 22, 2009, the Secretary, after consultation with recognized scientific, medical, and public health experts (including both Federal agencies and nongovernmental entities, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco), shall submit to the Congress a report that examines how best to regulate, promote, and encourage the development of innovative products and treatments (including nicotine-based and non-nicotine-based products and treatments) to better achieve, in a manner that best protects and promotes the public health—

(A)

total abstinence from tobacco use;

(B)

reductions in consumption of tobacco; and

(C)

reductions in the harm associated with continued tobacco use.

(2) Recommendations

The report under paragraph (1) shall include the recommendations of the Secretary on how the Food and Drug Administration should coordinate and facilitate the exchange of information on such innovative products and treatments among relevant offices and centers within the Administration and within the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other relevant agencies.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 918, as added Pub. L. 111–31, div. A, title I, § 101(b)(3), June 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1825.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 111-31 · 123 Stat. 1825
The record. According to the source credit, this section was added to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of June 25, 1938 (ch. 675) as a new section 918, enacted by Public Law 111–31, division A, title I, § 101(b)(3), on June 22, 2009, and published at 123 Stat. 1825. The credit reflects a single enactment event, with no subsequent amendments recorded. Historical context. Public Law 111–31 is commonly known as the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009. That Act is generally understood to have granted the Food and Drug Administration comprehensive authority to regulate tobacco products, following decades of debate over whether and how the federal government should oversee tobacco manufacturing, marketing, and sale in light of well-documented public health harms associated with tobacco use. Within that broader framework, provisions addressing smoking-cessation drug products are typically described as reflecting Congress's parallel interest in encouraging the development, approval, and expanded use of treatments—such as nicotine replacement therapies—that could help reduce tobacco dependence and its associated health consequences. Beyond this general legislative purpose, the record does not establish the specific reasoning that led Congress to include the particular directives found in this section, such as the fast-track consideration provisions or the mandated report on innovative cessation products. Any more detailed account of legislative intent for these specific requirements would be speculative and is not supported by the materials provided.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case