ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 862Denial of Federal benefits to drug traffickers and possessors

submitted 38 years ago by Pub. L. 91-513 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 912 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

People convicted of distributing or possessing controlled substances can lose federal benefits like grants and licenses. Repeat convictions bring longer or permanent ineligibility. The penalty is paused or waived for people getting drug treatment. It applies only to convictions after September 1, 1989.

(a) Anyone convicted of distributing controlled substances can lose federal benefits. A first conviction lets a court deny benefits for up to 5 years. A second conviction allows denial for up to 10 years. A third or later conviction means permanent loss of all federal benefits. This does not apply to long-term addiction treatment benefits for someone who is a declared, evidenced addict in treatment, or found rehabilitated. (b) Anyone convicted of possessing a controlled substance can also lose benefits. On a first conviction, a court may deny benefits for up to a year. It may instead require drug treatment and testing, require community service, or combine these steps. The court may also require completing treatment before benefits are restored. A second or later conviction brings ineligibility for all federal benefits for up to 5 years. These penalties are waived for a declared, evidenced addict entering treatment, or someone found rehabilitated. (c) The ineligibility period pauses if the person finishes supervised treatment or is otherwise rehabilitated. It also pauses if the person tried in good faith to get treatment but could not, due to access or cost. (d) A "Federal benefit" means a grant, contract, loan, or professional or commercial license from a federal agency. It does not include benefits like retirement, welfare, Social Security, health, disability, veterans, or housing benefits. A "veterans benefit" is any benefit given to veterans or their families for military service. (e) These penalties do not apply to someone who cooperates or testifies for the government, or who is in witness protection. (f) This section does not change the government's obligations to Indian tribes. It also does not exempt individual Indians from these penalties. But no Indian may lose benefits under comparable federal Indian programs. (g) The President had to report to Congress by May 1, 1989, on how this section is used and enforced. Congress then had to review that report by September 1, 1989. (h) This section applies only to convictions after September 1, 1989.

facts

- Codified at 21 U.S.C. § 862, titled "Denial of Federal benefits to drug traffickers and possessors," within the drug-abuse-prevention subchapter of Title 21. - Originally enacted as Pub. L. 100–690, title V, § 5301 (Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4310), later renumbered § 421 of Pub. L. 91–513 by Pub. L. 101–647, title X, § 1002(d) (Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4827). - The source-credit line reflects two legislative actions (original enactment and renumbering/amendment). - The provision spans 912 words and includes eight subsections (a)–(h). - Metadata indicates a total of 4 amendments have affected this section.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Drug traffickers
(1)

Any individual who is convicted of any Federal or State offense consisting of the distribution of controlled substances shall—

(A)

at the discretion of the court, upon the first conviction for such an offense be ineligible for any or all Federal benefits for up to 5 years after such conviction;

(B)

at the discretion of the court, upon a second conviction for such an offense be ineligible for any or all Federal benefits for up to 10 years after such conviction; and

(C)

upon a third or subsequent conviction for such an offense be permanently ineligible for all Federal benefits.

(2)

The benefits which are denied under this subsection shall not include benefits relating to long-term drug treatment programs for addiction for any person who, if there is a reasonable body of evidence to substantiate such declaration, declares himself to be an addict and submits himself to a long-term treatment program for addiction, or is deemed to be rehabilitated pursuant to rules established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(b) Drug possessors
(1)

Any individual who is convicted of any Federal or State offense involving the possession of a controlled substance (as such term is defined for purposes of this subchapter) shall—

(A)

upon the first conviction for such an offense and at the discretion of the court—

(i)

be ineligible for any or all Federal benefits for up to one year;

(ii)

be required to successfully complete an approved drug treatment program which includes periodic testing to insure that the individual remains drug free;

(iii)

be required to perform appropriate community service; or

(iv)

any combination of clause (i), (ii), or (iii); and

(B)

upon a second or subsequent conviction for such an offense be ineligible for all Federal benefits for up to 5 years after such conviction as determined by the court. The court shall continue to have the discretion in subparagraph (A) above. In imposing penalties and conditions under subparagraph (A), the court may require that the completion of the conditions imposed by clause (ii) or (iii) be a requirement for the reinstatement of benefits under clause (i).

(2)

The penalties and conditions which may be imposed under this subsection shall be waived in the case of a person who, if there is a reasonable body of evidence to substantiate such declaration, declares himself to be an addict and submits himself to a long-term treatment program for addiction, or is deemed to be rehabilitated pursuant to rules established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(c) Suspension of period of ineligibility

The period of ineligibility referred to in subsections (a) and (b) shall be suspended if the individual—

(A)

completes a supervised drug rehabilitation program after becoming ineligible under this section;

(B)

has otherwise been rehabilitated; or

(C)

has made a good faith effort to gain admission to a supervised drug rehabilitation program, but is unable to do so because of inaccessibility or unavailability of such a program, or the inability of the individual to pay for such a program.

(d) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1)

the term “Federal benefit”—

(A)

means the issuance of any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or commercial license provided by an agency of the United States or by appropriated funds of the United States; and

(B)

does not include any retirement, welfare, Social Security, health, disability, veterans benefit, public housing, or other similar benefit, or any other benefit for which payments or services are required for eligibility; and

(2)

the term “veterans benefit” means all benefits provided to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States.

(e) Inapplicability of this section to Government witnesses

The penalties provided by this section shall not apply to any individual who cooperates or testifies with the Government in the prosecution of a Federal or State offense or who is in a Government witness protection program.

(f) Indian provision

Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the obligation of the United States to any Indian or Indian tribe arising out of any treaty, statute, Executive order, or the trust responsibility of the United States owing to such Indian or Indian tribe. Nothing in this subsection shall exempt any individual Indian from the sanctions provided for in this section, provided that no individual Indian shall be denied any benefit under Federal Indian programs comparable to those described in subsection (d)(1)(B) or (d)(2).

(g) Presidential report
(1)

On or before May 1, 1989, the President shall transmit to the Congress a report—

(A)

delineating the role of State courts in implementing this section;

(B)

describing the manner in which Federal agencies will implement and enforce the requirements of this section;

(C)

detailing the means by which Federal and State agencies, courts, and law enforcement agencies will exchange and share the data and information necessary to implement and enforce the withholding of Federal benefits; and

(D)

recommending any modifications to improve the administration of this section or otherwise achieve the goal of discouraging the trafficking and possession of controlled substances.

(2)

No later than September 1, 1989, the Congress shall consider the report of the President and enact such changes as it deems appropriate to further the goals of this section.

(h) Effective date

The denial of Federal benefits set forth in this section shall take effect for convictions occurring after September 1, 1989.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 91–513, title II, § 421, formerly Pub. L. 100–690, title V, § 5301, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4310; renumbered § 421 of Pub. L. 91–513 and amended Pub. L. 101–647, title X, § 1002(d), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4827.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1988Enacted · Pub. L. 91-513 · 102 Stat. 4310
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 91-513 · 104 Stat. 4827
The record shows that this section was originally enacted as § 5301 of title V of Public Law 100-690, approved November 18, 1988, and published at 102 Stat. 4310. The source credit indicates that the provision was subsequently renumbered as § 421 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 91-513) and amended by Public Law 101-647, title X, § 1002(d), enacted November 29, 1990. Beyond this renumbering and amendment, the record does not detail further legislative activity. Public Law 100-690 is commonly known as the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, a major piece of federal drug-control legislation enacted during a period of heightened national concern over illicit drug use and trafficking. The Act is generally understood to have expanded federal criminal penalties, funding for enforcement and treatment, and administrative sanctions aimed at deterring drug offenses. Provisions denying federal benefits to those convicted of drug trafficking or possession, such as this section, are commonly associated with the broader legislative strategy of that era to use collateral consequences—beyond criminal sentencing—as an additional deterrent. The specific legislative reasoning behind the graduated benefit-denial scheme, the treatment-program exceptions, and the later 1990 amendment renumbering the section is not established by the materials provided here. Without access to committee reports or floor debate, the precise intent behind these design choices cannot be confirmed, and no such details should be inferred beyond the general historical context of the 1988 Act's anti-drug enforcement purpose.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case