ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

22 U.S.C. § 263bTransnational repression accountability and prevention

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 117-81 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 1,313 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress says some INTERPOL countries misuse its systems to target political opponents and journalists. This law directs U.S. officials to push for INTERPOL reforms and report on abuses. It also bars extraditing people based only on an INTERPOL notice.

(a) Sense of Congress. Congress states its view that some INTERPOL member countries have repeatedly misused INTERPOL's databases and processes — including its Notice and Diffusion systems — for overtly political or otherwise unlawful purposes, in violation of international human rights standards. This includes using INTERPOL to harass or persecute political opponents, human rights defenders, or journalists. (b) Support for INTERPOL institutional reforms. The Attorney General and the Secretary of State must use the United States' voice, vote, and influence, as appropriate, in INTERPOL's General Assembly and Executive Committee to push for reforms that make INTERPOL more transparent and keep it operating consistently with its Constitution — especially articles 2 and 3 — and its Rules on the Processing of Data. Specifically, they must: support reforms that improve the screening of Notices, Diffusions, and other INTERPOL communications so they comply with INTERPOL's Constitution and Rules on the Processing of Data; support and strengthen INTERPOL's coordination with the Commission for Control of INTERPOL's Files ("CCF") so that once INTERPOL or the CCF finds a member country issued a Notice, Diffusion, or other communication against someone in violation of INTERPOL's Constitution or Rules, that country is blocked from seeking any further Notice, Diffusion, or communication against the same person based on the same claims or facts; increase, where practical, dedicated funding for the CCF and the Notices and Diffusions Task Force so they can expand their review of red notice and red diffusion requests; support candidates for INTERPOL leadership roles — including the Presidency, Executive Committee, General Secretariat, and CCF — who have shown experience with, and respect for, the rule of law; and push INTERPOL to include, in its annual report, a country-by-country breakdown of the number of Notice requests it received by color, the number it rejected by color, the type of violation behind each rejected Notice, the number of Diffusions it cancelled without a CCF decision, and the sources of all its income for the period. They must also push the CCF to be more transparent in its own annual report by breaking down, by country, the number of admissible requests it received to correct or delete data tied to issued Notices, Diffusions, or other communications, and the type of violation alleged in each. Beyond that, the Attorney General and Secretary of State must tell INTERPOL's General Secretariat about incidents where member countries abuse INTERPOL communications for political or other unlawful purposes, so INTERPOL can act on them; and must seek to censure member countries that repeatedly abuse the red notice and red diffusion systems, including by restricting those countries' access to INTERPOL's data and information systems. (c) Report on INTERPOL. Within 180 days after December 27, 2021, and then every two years for 4 years after that, the Attorney General and the Secretary of State — working with other relevant federal agencies — must send Congress's appropriate committees a report assessing how INTERPOL member countries have abused Red Notices, Diffusions, and other INTERPOL communications for political or other unlawful purposes over the past three years. Each report must include: a list of countries the Attorney General and Secretary determine have repeatedly abused these systems for political purposes; a description of the most common abuse tactics, including the crimes most often alleged and the communications most often misused; an assessment of how well INTERPOL's mechanisms — including the CCF, and specifically its March 2017 Operating Rules — handle abusive requests, plus any shortcomings the United States thinks should be fixed; a description of how INTERPOL's General Secretariat spots politically motivated or rule-violating red notice and red diffusion requests, and how it reviews and handles abuse cases; a description of any cases where the Justice Department found that U.S. courts or agencies relied on INTERPOL communications, against existing law or policy, to detain someone or decide their immigration, asylum, withholding-of-removal, or Convention Against Torture claims, and what was done in response; a description of how the United States monitors and responds to likely abuse affecting U.S. citizens and nationals, U.S. government employees, lawful permanent residents, aliens lawfully present in the United States, or aliens with pending asylum, withholding-of-removal, or Convention Against Torture claims — even if they are unlawfully present; a description of what the United States does in response to credible information about abuse targeting U.S. government employees for actions they took in their official role; a description of U.S. advocacy for reform and good governance at INTERPOL; and a strategy for improving coordination between agencies to identify and address INTERPOL abuse affecting U.S. interests, including human rights and the groups of people listed above. Each report must be unclassified, though it may include a classified annex, and the unclassified part must be posted on a public State Department and Justice Department website. Within 30 days after each report, the Justice and State Departments — with other relevant agencies — must brief Congress's appropriate committees on the report's contents and on recent instances of INTERPOL abuse and U.S. efforts to identify, challenge, and promote reform against that abuse. (d) Prohibition regarding basis for extradition. No U.S. government department or agency may extradite someone based solely on an INTERPOL Red Notice or Diffusion issued by another member country for that person. (e) Definitions. "Appropriate committees of Congress" means the Senate Committees on Foreign Relations and the Judiciary, and the House Committees on Foreign Affairs and the Judiciary. "INTERPOL communications" means any INTERPOL Notice or Diffusion, or any entry into an INTERPOL database or other communications system INTERPOL maintains.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that some INTERPOL member countries have repeatedly misused INTERPOL’s databases and processes, including Notice and Diffusion mechanisms, to conduct activities of an overtly political or other unlawful character and in violation of international human rights standards, including by making requests to harass or persecute political opponents, human rights defenders, or journalists.

(b) Support for INTERPOL institutional reforms

The Attorney General and the Secretary of State shall—

(1)

use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States, as appropriate, within INTERPOL’s General Assembly and Executive Committee to promote reforms aimed at improving the transparency of INTERPOL and ensuring its operation consistent with its Constitution, particularly articles 2 and 3, and Rules on the Processing of Data, including—

(A)

supporting INTERPOL’s reforms enhancing the screening process for Notices, Diffusions, and other INTERPOL communications to ensure they comply with INTERPOL’s Constitution and Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD);

(B)

supporting and strengthening INTERPOL’s coordination with the Commission for Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) in cases in which INTERPOL or the CCF has determined that a member country issued a Notice, Diffusion, or other INTERPOL communication against an individual in violation of articles 2 or 3 of the INTERPOL Constitution, or the RPD, to prohibit such member country from seeking the publication or issuance of any subsequent Notices, Diffusions, or other INTERPOL communication against the same individual based on the same set of claims or facts;

(C)

increasing, to the extent practicable, dedicated funding to the CCF and the Notices and Diffusions Task Force in order to further expand operations related to the review of requests for red notices and red diffusions;

(D)

supporting candidates for positions within INTERPOL’s structures, including the Presidency, Executive Committee, General Secretariat, and CCF who have demonstrated experience relating to and respect for the rule of law;

(E)

seeking to require INTERPOL in its annual report to provide a detailed account, disaggregated by member country or entity of—

(i)

the number of Notice requests, disaggregated by color, that it received;

(ii)

the number of Notice requests, disaggregated by color, that it rejected;

(iii)

the category of violation identified in each instance of a rejected Notice;

(iv)

the number of Diffusions that it cancelled without reference to decisions by the CCF; and

(v)

the sources of all INTERPOL income during the reporting period; and

(F)

supporting greater transparency by the CCF in its annual report by providing a detailed account, disaggregated by country, of—

(i)

the number of admissible requests for correction or deletion of data received by the CCF regarding issued Notices, Diffusions, and other INTERPOL communications; and

(ii)

the category of violation alleged in each such complaint;

(2)

inform the INTERPOL General Secretariat about incidents in which member countries abuse INTERPOL communications for politically motivated or other unlawful purposes so that, as appropriate, action can be taken by INTERPOL; and

(3)

request to censure member countries that repeatedly abuse and misuse INTERPOL’s red notice and red diffusion mechanisms, including restricting the access of those countries to INTERPOL’s data and information systems.

(c) Report on INTERPOL
(1) In general

Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2021, and biannually thereafter for a period of 4 years, the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of other relevant United States Government departments or agencies, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing an assessment of how INTERPOL member countries abuse INTERPOL Red Notices, Diffusions, and other INTERPOL communications for political motives and other unlawful purposes within the past three years.

(2) Elements

The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A)

A list of countries that the Attorney General and the Secretary determine have repeatedly abused and misused the red notice and red diffusion mechanisms for political purposes.

(B)

A description of the most common tactics employed by member countries in conducting such abuse, including the crimes most commonly alleged and the INTERPOL communications most commonly exploited.

(C)

An assessment of the adequacy of INTERPOL mechanisms for challenging abusive requests, including the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF), an assessment of the CCF’s March 2017 Operating Rules, and any shortcoming the United States believes should be addressed.

(D)

A description of how INTERPOL’s General Secretariat identifies requests for red notice or red diffusions that are politically motivated or are otherwise in violation of INTERPOL’s rules and how INTERPOL reviews and addresses cases in which a member country has abused or misused the red notice and red diffusion mechanisms for overtly political purposes.

(E)

A description of any incidents in which the Department of Justice assesses that United States courts and executive departments or agencies have relied on INTERPOL communications in contravention of existing law or policy to seek the detention of individuals or render judgments concerning their immigration status or requests for asylum, with holding of removal, or convention against torture claims and any measures the Department of Justice or other executive departments or agencies took in response to these incidents.

(F)

A description of how the United States monitors and responds to likely instances of abuse of INTERPOL communications by member countries that could affect the interests of the United States, including citizens and nationals of the United States, employees of the United States Government, aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, aliens who are lawfully present in the United States, or aliens with pending asylum, withholding of removal, or convention against torture claims, though they may be unlawfully present in the United States.

(G)

A description of what actions the United States takes in response to credible information it receives concerning likely abuse of INTERPOL communications targeting employees of the United States Government for activities they undertook in an official capacity.

(H)

A description of United States advocacy for reform and good governance within INTERPOL.

(I)

A strategy for improving interagency coordination to identify and address instances of INTERPOL abuse that affect the interests of the United States, including international respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, citizens and nationals of the United States, employees of the United States Government, aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, aliens who are lawfully present in the United States, or aliens with pending asylum, withholding of removal, or convention against torture claims, though they may be unlawfully present in the United States.

(3) Form of report

Each report required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex, as appropriate. The unclassified portion of the report shall be posted on a publicly available website of the Department of State and of the Department of Justice.

(4) Briefing

Not later than 30 days after the submission of each report under paragraph (1), the Department of Justice and the Department of State, in coordination with other relevant United States Government departments and agencies, shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the content of the reports and recent instances of INTERPOL abuse by member countries and United States efforts to identify and challenge such abuse, including efforts to promote reform and good governance within INTERPOL.

(d) Prohibition regarding basis for extradition

No United States Government department or agency may extradite an individual based solely on an INTERPOL Red Notice or Diffusion issued by another INTERPOL member country for such individual.

(e) Definitions

In this section:

(1) Appropriate committees of Congress

The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(A)

the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

(2) INTERPOL communications

The term “INTERPOL communications” means any INTERPOL Notice or Diffusion or any entry into any INTERPOL database or other communications system maintained by INTERPOL.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXV, § 6503, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2423.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 117-81 · 135 Stat. 2423

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-81 on 2021-12-27.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case