ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

22 U.S.C. § 290g–6Civil action by or against the Fund; service of process, venue, jurisdiction, removal of actions

submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-302 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 167 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The African Development Fund can sue or be sued in U.S. federal court. It's treated as if it lives in the federal district where its main U.S. office is. If sued in state court, the Fund can move the case to federal court before trial.

For any civil lawsuit that may be brought within the United States, its territories or possessions, or Puerto Rico, by or against the Fund under the agreement: the Fund is treated as living in whichever federal judicial district holds its principal office, or the office it names to accept service of legal notices. Any such lawsuit involving the Fund is treated as arising under United States law, so U.S. district courts (including the courts listed in section 460 of title 28) have original jurisdiction to hear it. If the Fund is sued as a defendant in a state court, it may, any time before trial, remove the case to the appropriate U.S. district court, following the normal legal procedure for removing cases.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

For the purpose of any civil action which may be brought within the United States, its territories or possessions, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, by or against the Fund in accordance with the agreement, the Fund shall be deemed to be an inhabitant of the Federal judicial district in which its principal office or agency appointed for the purpose of accepting service or notice of service is located, and any such action to which the Fund shall be party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States, and the district courts of the United States (including the courts enumerated in section 460 of title 28) shall have original jurisdiction of any such action. When the Fund is defendant in any action in a State court, it may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action into the district court of the United States for the proper district by following the procedure for removal of causes otherwise provided by law.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–302, title II, § 208, May 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 594.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-302 · 90 Stat. 594

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-302 on 1976-05-31.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case