ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

22 U.S.C. § 290k–3Opposition to certain guarantees or investment promotions; independent evaluation of guaranteed investments

submitted 39 years ago by Pub. L. 100-202 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 319 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Treasury Secretary must direct the U.S. Director to oppose harmful guarantees and conduct yearly evaluations of how guaranteed investments affect U.S. jobs. Reports go to Congress and must include labor organizations' views.

(1) In line with the goals in section 290k–2, the Secretary of the Treasury must instruct the U.S. Director to oppose — and to actively try to get other Board members to also oppose — any guarantee or investment promotion the Agency is considering, if the investment would: (A) go to a country that isn't a "beneficiary developing country" under the Trade Act of 1974 because it hasn't taken steps to give workers internationally recognized rights; (B) be subject to trade-distorting requirements from the host country likely to cause a significant net drop in (i) U.S. employment, or (ii) other trade benefits the U.S. would get from the investment; or (C) likely increase a country's production capacity in an industry that already has too much worldwide capacity, causing real harm to U.S. producers of the same or similar or competing products. (2) Within 12 months after the U.S. becomes an Agency member, and again each year for the next three years, the Secretary must independently evaluate the U.S.-guaranteed investments. The evaluation must figure out (A) the expected overall effect on U.S. jobs and exports, and (B) how many of those investments went to countries that were not affording workers their internationally recognized rights. While doing each evaluation, the Secretary must actively ask for, and take into account, the views of U.S. labor organizations. Once each evaluation is done, the Secretary must send a copy to Congress.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Consistent with the purposes of section 290k–2 of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall—

(1)

instruct the United States Director to oppose, and to actively seek the concurrence of other members of the Board of Directors in opposing, any guarantee or other investment promotion under consideration by the Agency if the proposed investment would—

(A)

be in any country which is not a beneficiary developing country for purposes of title V of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.] because it has not taken or is not taking steps to afford internationally-recognized workers’ rights to workers in that country;

(B)

be subject to trade-distorting performance requirements imposed by the host country that are likely to result in a significant net reduction in—

(i)

employment in the United States; or

(ii)

other trade benefits likely to accrue to the United States from the investment; or

(C)

likely increase a country’s productive capacity in an industry already facing excess worldwide capacity for the same, similar or competing product, and cause substantial injury to producers of such products in the United States; and

(2)

within 12 months after the United States becomes a member of the Agency and each year thereafter for the 3 succeeding years, conduct an independent evaluation of the United States investments which have been guaranteed by the Agency to determine—

(A)

the anticipated net impact of such investments on employment in and exports from the United States, and

(B)

the extent to which such investments were made in countries which had not taken or are not taking steps to afford internationally-recognized workers’ rights to workers in those countries.

In the course of conducting each evaluation required under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall actively solicit and take into account the views of United States labor organizations. The Secretary shall furnish a copy of each such evaluation on its completion to the Congress.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 100–202, § 101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1987Enacted · Pub. L. 100-202 · 101 Stat. 1329

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 100-202 on 1987-12-22.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case