23 U.S.C. § 159 — Revocation or suspension of drivers’ licenses of individuals convicted of drug offenses
submitted 35 years ago by Pub. L. 102-143 to r/title-23-HIGHWAYS · 553 words · no verdicts yet
States that don't revoke driver's licenses of people convicted of drug crimes lose part of their federal highway funds. States can opt out if the governor and legislature formally object. Withheld funds are gone for good.
The Secretary* shall withhold 10 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to any State* under each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (5) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century) of section 104(b) on the first day of each fiscal year which begins after the fourth calendar year following the effective date of this section if the State does not meet the requirements of paragraph (3) on the first day of such fiscal year.
The Secretary shall withhold an amount equal to 8 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to any State under each of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 104(b) on the first day of each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2011, if the State fails to meet the requirements of paragraph (3) on the first day of the fiscal year.
A State meets the requirements of this paragraph if—
the State has enacted and is enforcing a law that requires in all circumstances, or requires in the absence of compelling circumstances warranting an exception—
the revocation, or suspension for at least 6 months, of the driver’s license of any individual who is convicted, after the enactment of such law, of—
any violation of the Controlled Substances Act, or
any drug offense; and
a delay in the issuance or reinstatement of a driver’s license to such an individual for at least 6 months after the individual applies for the issuance or reinstatement of a driver’s license if the individual does not have a driver’s license, or the driver’s license of the individual is suspended, at the time the individual is so convicted; or
the Governor of the State—
submits to the Secretary no earlier than the adjournment sine die of the first regularly scheduled session of the State’s legislature which begins after the effective date of this section a written certification stating that the Governor is opposed to the enactment or enforcement in the State of a law described in subparagraph (A), relating to the revocation, suspension, issuance, or reinstatement of drivers’ licenses to convicted drug offenders; and
submits to the Secretary a written certification that the legislature (including both Houses where applicable) has adopted a resolution expressing its opposition to a law described in clause (i).
No funds withheld under this section from apportionments to any State shall be available for apportionment* to that State.
For purposes of this section—
The term “driver’s license” means a license issued by a State to any individual that authorizes the individual to operate a motor vehicle on highways.
The term “drug offense” means any criminal offense which proscribes—
the possession, distribution, manufacture, cultivation, sale, transfer, or the attempt or conspiracy to possess, distribute, manufacture, cultivate, sell, or transfer any substance the possession of which is prohibited under the Controlled Substances Act; or
the operation of a motor vehicle under the influence of such a substance.
The term “convicted” includes adjudicated under juvenile proceedings.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 102–143, title III, § 333(a), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 944; amended Pub. L. 102–388, title III, § 327(a), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1547; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, § 1103(l)(3)(E), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 126; Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, § 1404(g), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 558.)
- 1991Enacted · Pub. L. 102-143 · 105 Stat. 944
- 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-388 · 106 Stat. 1547
- 1998Amended · Pub. L. 105-178 · 112 Stat. 126
- 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-141 · 126 Stat. 558
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-143 on 1991-10-28.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case