ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

23 U.S.C. § 326State assumption of responsibility for categorical exclusions

submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 109-59 to r/title-23-HIGHWAYS · 863 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A state can take over deciding which highway projects skip full environmental review. The Secretary of Transportation sets the rules the state must follow. The state alone is responsible for any federal law it takes on.

(a) Categorical Exclusion Determinations — (1) In general: The Secretary of Transportation can hand off, and a state can take on, the job of deciding whether certain kinds of highway work count as "categorically excluded" — meaning they're so minor they don't need a full environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. This follows the categories the Council on Environmental Quality had set as of October 1, 2003. (2) Scope of authority: The state can only make these calls using rules the Secretary sets, and only for the specific kinds of activities the Secretary names. (3) Criteria: Those rules must let the public see the information, following the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552) and the National Environmental Policy Act. (4) Preservation of flexibility: The Secretary can't force a state to give up any project-building method that would otherwise be allowed, just because the state took on this job. (b) Other Applicable Federal Laws — (1) In general: If a state takes on the job in (a), the Secretary can also hand off other federal environmental review duties tied to those excluded projects — except for government-to-government talks with Indian tribes. The state must follow the same rules the Secretary would have followed. (2) Sole responsibility: Once the state takes on a federal law this way, the state — not the Secretary — is fully responsible and fully liable for following it. (c) Memoranda of Understanding — (1) In general: The Secretary and the state must first let the public comment, then sign a written agreement (called a memorandum of understanding) spelling out what's being handed off and when the Secretary could take it back. (2) Assistance to states: If a governor asks, the Secretary must help the state with technical assistance and training — for taking on this job, writing the agreement, or fixing problems flagged under (d)(1)(B). (3) Term: The agreement usually lasts up to 3 years and can be renewed. A state that has held this responsibility for at least 10 years gets a 5-year term instead. (4) Acceptance of jurisdiction: In the agreement, the state agrees that federal courts can enforce its compliance with the responsibilities it takes on. (5) Monitoring: The Secretary must check that the state is following the agreement and providing enough money to carry it out, and must weigh the state's performance when deciding whether to renew. (d) Termination — (1) Termination by Secretary: The Secretary can end a state's participation if the state isn't doing the job right. First the Secretary must notify the state, give it at least 120 days to fix the problem, and — if the governor asks — explain exactly what needs fixing. Only if the state still doesn't fix it can the Secretary terminate. (2) Termination by the state: The state can quit anytime by giving the Secretary at least 90 days' notice, following any conditions the Secretary sets. (e) State Agency Deemed to Be Federal Agency: A state agency doing this job is treated as if it were a federal agency for purposes of the law it's carrying out. (f) Legal Fees: A state can use its federal highway funds (apportioned under section 104(b)(2)) to pay attorney's fees tied to this work on a project.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Categorical Exclusion Determinations.—
(1)In general.—

The Secretary may assign, and a State may assume, responsibility for determining whether certain designated activities are included within classes of action identified in regulation by the Secretary that are categorically excluded from requirements for environmental assessments or environmental impact statements pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality under part 1500 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on October 1, 2003).

(2)Scope of authority.—

A determination described in paragraph (1) shall be made by a State in accordance with criteria established by the Secretary and only for types of activities specifically designated by the Secretary.

(3)Criteria.—

The criteria under paragraph (2) shall include provisions for public availability of information consistent with section 552 of title 5 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

(4)Preservation of flexibility.—

The Secretary shall not require a State, as a condition of assuming responsibility under this section, to forego project delivery methods that are otherwise permissible for highway projects.

(b)Other Applicable Federal Laws.—
(1)In general.—

If a State assumes responsibility under subsection (a), the Secretary may also assign and the State may assume all or part of the responsibilities of the Secretary for environmental review, consultation, or other related actions required under any Federal law applicable to activities that are classified by the Secretary as categorical exclusions, with the exception of government-to-government consultation with Indian tribes, subject to the same procedural and substantive requirements as would be required if that responsibility were carried out by the Secretary.

(2)Sole responsibility.—

A State that assumes responsibility under paragraph (1) with respect to a Federal law shall be solely responsible and solely liable for complying with and carrying out that law, and the Secretary shall have no such responsibility or liability.

(c)Memoranda of Understanding.—
(1)In general.—

The Secretary and the State, after providing public notice and opportunity for comment, shall enter into a memorandum of understanding setting forth the responsibilities to be assigned under this section and the terms and conditions under which the assignments are made, including establishment of the circumstances under which the Secretary would reassume responsibility for categorical exclusion determinations.

(2)Assistance to states.—

On request of a Governor of a State, the Secretary shall provide to the State technical assistance, training, or other support relating to—

(A)

assuming responsibility under subsection (a);

(B)

developing a memorandum of understanding under this subsection; or

(C)

addressing a responsibility in need of corrective action under subsection (d)(1)(B).

(3)Term.—

A memorandum of understanding—

(A)

except as provided under subparagraph (C), shall have a term of not more than 3 years;

(B)

shall be renewable; and

(C)

shall have a term of 5 years, in the case of a State that has assumed the responsibility for categorical exclusions under this section for not fewer than 10 years.

(4)Acceptance of jurisdiction.—

In a memorandum of understanding, the State shall consent to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the compliance, discharge, and enforcement of any responsibility of the Secretary that the State assumes.

(5)Monitoring.—

The Secretary shall—

(A)

monitor compliance by the State with the memorandum of understanding and the provision by the State of financial resources to carry out the memorandum of understanding; and

(B)

take into account the performance by the State when considering renewal of the memorandum of understanding.

(d)Termination.—
(1)Termination by secretary.—

The Secretary may terminate the participation of any State in the program if—

(A)

the Secretary determines that the State is not adequately carrying out the responsibilities assigned to the State;

(B)

the Secretary provides to the State—

(i)

a notification of the determination of noncompliance;

(ii)

a period of not less than 120 days to take such corrective action as the Secretary determines to be necessary to comply with the applicable agreement; and

(iii)

on request of the Governor of the State, a detailed description of each responsibility in need of corrective action regarding an inadequacy identified under subparagraph (A); and

(C)

the State, after the notification and period described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (B), fails to take satisfactory corrective action, as determined by the Secretary.

(2)Termination by the state.—

The State may terminate the participation of the State in the program at any time by providing to the Secretary a notice not later than the date that is 90 days before the date of termination, and subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may provide.

(e)State Agency Deemed to Be Federal Agency.—

A State agency that is assigned a responsibility under a memorandum of understanding shall be deemed to be a Federal agency for the purposes of the Federal law under which the responsibility is exercised.

(f)Legal Fees.—

A State assuming the responsibilities of the Secretary under this section for a specific project may use funds apportioned to the State under section 104(b)(2) for attorney’s fees directly attributable to eligible activities associated with the project.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 109–59, title VI, § 6004(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1867; amended Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, § 1312, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 545; Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, § 1307, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1390; Pub. L. 117–58, div. A, title I, § 11314, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 540.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 109-59 · 119 Stat. 1867
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-141 · 126 Stat. 545
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-94 · 129 Stat. 1390
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 117-58 · 135 Stat. 540

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-59 on 2005-08-10.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case