ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

25 U.S.C. § 342Removal of Southern Utes to new reservation

submitted 139 years ago by ch. 119 to r/title-25-INDIANS · 45 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law doesn't stop the Southern Ute Indians from moving off their reservation in southwestern Colorado. They can move to a new reservation instead. A majority of the tribe's adult male members must first agree to the move.

Nothing in this act prevents the Southern Ute Indians from being removed from their current reservation in southwestern Colorado. They can be moved to a new reservation instead. But this can only happen with the consent of a majority of the adult male members of the tribe.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Nothing in this act shall be so construed as to prevent the removal of the Southern Ute Indians from their present reservation in southwestern Colorado to a new reservation by and with the consent of a majority of the adult male members of said tribe.

Source credit: (Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, § 11, 24 Stat. 391.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1887Enacted · Act of Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119 · 24 Stat. 391

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 119 on 1887-02-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case