0
25 U.S.C. § 43 — Persons paid for other services not paid for interpreting
submitted 116 years ago by ch. 140 to r/title-25-INDIANS · 18 words · no verdicts yet
in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice
If the federal government already pays someone for a job, that person can't also get paid to interpret. This law blocks double payment for interpreting work. It applies only to people already employed and paid by the United States.
If someone already works for the United States and gets paid for some other job, this law says they cannot also be paid to interpret. In other words, a federal employee can't collect a second, separate payment for interpreting work on top of their regular pay.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
No person employed by the United States and paid for any other service shall be paid for interpreting.
Source credit: (Apr. 4, 1910, ch. 140, § 2, 36 Stat. 272.)
history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
- 1910Enacted · Act of Apr. 4, 1910, ch. 140 · 36 Stat. 272
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 140 on 1910-04-04.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case