0
25 U.S.C. § 85 — Contracts relating to tribal funds or property
submitted 113 years ago by ch. 4 to r/title-25-INDIANS · 49 words · no verdicts yet
in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice
A contract with an Indian person about tribal funds or property held by the United States is not valid without the government's advance consent. Payment for services connected to such a contract also requires that consent first.
No contract made with an Indian person is valid if it relates to tribal funds or property held by the United States, unless the United States has already given its consent beforehand. Likewise, nobody may be paid for services connected to such a contract unless the United States gave its consent first.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
No contract made with any Indian, where such contract relates to the tribal funds or property in the hands of the United States, shall be valid, nor shall any payment for services rendered in relation thereto be made unless the consent of the United States has previously been given.
Source credit: (June 30, 1913, ch. 4, § 18, 38 Stat. 97.)
history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
- 1913Enacted · Act of June 30, 1913, ch. 4 · 38 Stat. 97
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 4 on 1913-06-30.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case