ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

26 U.S.C. § 5614Burden of proof in cases of seizure of spirits

submitted 68 years ago by Pub. L. 85-859 to r/title-26-INTERNAL-REVENUE-CODE · 199 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Whenever seizure is made of any distilled spirits found elsewhere than on the premises of a distilled spirits plant, or than in any warehouse authorized by law, or than in the store or place of business of a wholesale liquor dealer, or than in transit from any one of said places; or of any distilled spirits found in any one of the places aforesaid, or in transit therefrom, which have not been received into or sent out therefrom in conformity to law, or in regard to which any of the entries required by law, or regulations issued pursuant thereto, to be made in respect of such spirits, have not been made at the time or in the manner required, or in respect to which any owner or person having possession, control, or charge of said spirits, has omitted to do any act required to be done, or has done or committed any act prohibited in regard to said spirits, the burden of proof shall be upon the claimant of said spirits to show that no fraud has been committed, and that all the requirements of the law in relation to the payment of the tax have been complied with.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, § 201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1405.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1958Enacted · Pub. L. 85-859 · 72 Stat. 1405

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 85-859 on 1958-09-02.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case