26 U.S.C. § 7525 — Confidentiality privileges relating to taxpayer communications
submitted 28 years ago by Pub. L. 105-206 to r/title-26-INTERNAL-REVENUE-CODE · 276 words · no verdicts yet
This section extends attorney-client confidentiality protection for tax advice to communications with federally authorized tax practitioners in specified noncriminal matters. It excludes written communications connected with promoting participation in a tax shelter.
(a) Uniform application to taxpayer* communications with federally authorized practitioners. (1) For tax advice, the common-law confidentiality protection for a taxpayer–attorney communication also protects a taxpayer’s communication with a federally authorized tax practitioner to the extent it would be privileged between taxpayer and attorney. (2) The protection may be asserted only in (A) a noncriminal tax matter before the Internal Revenue Service, or (B) a noncriminal tax proceeding in federal court brought by or against the United States. (3) “Federally authorized tax practitioner” means an individual authorized under federal law to practice before the Internal Revenue Service when that practice is federally regulated under 31 U.S.C. §330. “Tax advice” means advice by an individual about a matter within that person’s authorized practice.
(b) Tax-shelter communications excluded. The privilege does not cover a written communication between a federally authorized tax practitioner and (1) a person, a director, officer, employee*, agent, or representative of that person, or another person holding a capital or profits interest in that person, when the communication is (2) connected with promoting that person’s direct or indirect participation in a tax shelter as defined in section 6662(d)(2)(C)(ii).
With respect to tax advice, the same common law protections of confidentiality which apply to a communication between a taxpayer and an attorney shall also apply to a communication between a taxpayer and any federally authorized tax practitioner to the extent the communication would be considered a privileged communication if it were between a taxpayer and an attorney.
Paragraph (1) may only be asserted in—
any noncriminal tax matter before the Internal Revenue Service; and
any noncriminal tax proceeding in Federal court brought by or against the United States.
For purposes of this subsection—
The term “federally authorized tax practitioner” means any individual who is authorized under Federal law to practice before the Internal Revenue Service if such practice is subject to Federal regulation under section 330 of title 31, United States Code.
The term “tax advice” means advice given by an individual with respect to a matter which is within the scope of the individual’s authority to practice described in subparagraph (A).
The privilege under subsection (a) shall not apply to any written communication which is—
between a federally authorized tax practitioner and—
any person,
any director, officer, employee*, agent, or representative of the person, or
any other person holding a capital or profits interest in the person, and
in connection with the promotion of the direct or indirect participation of the person in any tax shelter (as defined in section 6662(d)(2)(C)(ii)).
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 105–206, title III, § 3411(a), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 750; amended Pub. L. 108–357, title VIII, § 813(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1581.)
- 1998Enacted · Pub. L. 105-206 · 112 Stat. 750
- 2004Amended · Pub. L. 108-357 · 118 Stat. 1581
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-206 on 1998-07-22.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case