27 U.S.C. § 122b — General provisions
submitted 113 years ago by Pub. L. 106-386 to r/title-27-INTOXICATING-LIQUORS · 155 words · no verdicts yet
This section clarifies limits on the alcohol-shipment law: it doesn't change the Internet Tax Freedom Act, and it can't be used to get an injunction against an internet or electronic communications service just because someone else used that service to break the law, or to block lawful advertising or marketing of alcohol.
Nothing in this section may be construed to modify or supersede the operation of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note).
Nothing in this section may be construed to—
authorize any injunction against an interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(f) of title 471 used by another person to engage in any activity that is subject to this Act;
authorize any injunction against an electronic communication service (as defined in section 2510(15) of title 18) used by another person to engage in any activity that is subject to this Act; or
authorize an injunction prohibiting the advertising or marketing of any intoxicating liquor by any person in any case in which such advertising or marketing is lawful in the jurisdiction from which the importation, transportation or other conduct to which this Act applies originates.
Source credit: (Mar. 1, 1913, ch. 90, § 3, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. C, § 2004(a), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1548.)
- 1913Enacted · Pub. L. 106-386 · 114 Stat. 1548
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-386 on 1913-03-01.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case