ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 1659Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-465 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 205 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Stay.—

In a civil action involving parties that are also parties to a proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the request of a party to the civil action that is also a respondent in the proceeding before the Commission, the district court shall stay, until the determination of the Commission becomes final, proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that involves the same issues involved in the proceeding before the Commission, but only if such request is made within—

(1)

30 days after the party is named as a respondent in the proceeding before the Commission, or

(2)

30 days after the district court action is filed,

whichever is later.

(b)Use of Commission Record.—

Notwithstanding section 337(n)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, after dissolution of a stay under subsection (a), the record of the proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission shall be transmitted to the district court and shall be admissible in the civil action, subject to such protective order as the district court determines necessary, to the extent permitted under the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 103–465, title III, § 321(b)(1)(A), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4945.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-465 · 108 Stat. 4945

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-465 on 1994-12-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case