ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 1919 — Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction

submitted 78 years ago by ch. 646 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 35 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is governed by the rules in this section. Whenever any action or suit is dismissed in any district court, the Court of International Trade, or the Court of Federal Claims for want of jurisdiction, that court may order the payment of just costs.

Whenever any action or suit is dismissed in any district court, the Court of International Trade, or the Court of Federal Claims for want of jurisdiction, that court may order the payment of just costs.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Whenever any action or suit is dismissed in any district court, the Court of International Trade, or the Court of Federal Claims for want of jurisdiction, such court may order the payment of just costs.

Source credit: (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 510, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 908(a), (b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4519.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1948Enacted · Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 646 · 62 Stat. 955
  • 1980Amended · Pub. L. 96-417 · 94 Stat. 1743
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-572 · 106 Stat. 4519

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 646 on 1948-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case