ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 474 — Review of district court action

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-650 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 190 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Chief judges review each district court's cost-and-delay reduction plan as a circuit committee. They can suggest changes the court should make. The Judicial Conference of the United States also reviews these plans and can ask for more action.

(a) (1) The chief judge of each circuit's district courts, together with the chief judge of the circuit, form a committee that must (A) review every plan and report a district court submits under section 472(d) of this title, and (B) suggest any extra or changed actions the committee thinks the district court should take to cut the cost and delay of civil cases. (2) A circuit's chief judge can appoint another judge from that circuit's court of appeals, and a district court's chief judge can appoint another judge from that court, to handle these duties instead.

(b) The Judicial Conference of the United States must (1) review every plan and report a district court submits under section 472(d) of this title, and (2) may ask the district court to take further action if the Conference decides the court hasn't adequately responded to its civil and criminal caseload conditions or to its own advisory group's recommendations.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)
(1)

The chief judge of each district court in a circuit and the chief judge of the circuit shall, as a committee—

(A)

review each plan and report submitted pursuant to section 472(d) of this title; and

(B)

make such suggestions for additional actions or modified actions of that district court as the committee considers appropriate for reducing cost and delay in civil litigation in the district court.

(2)

The chief judge of a circuit may designate another judge of the court of appeals of that circuit, and the chief judge of a district court may designate another judge of such court, to perform that chief judge’s responsibilities under paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(b)

The Judicial Conference of the United States—

(1)

shall review each plan and report submitted by a district court pursuant to section 472(d) of this title; and

(2)

may request the district court to take additional action if the Judicial Conference determines that such court has not adequately responded to the conditions relevant to the civil and criminal dockets of the court or to the recommendations of the district court’s advisory group.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, § 103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5093; amended Pub. L. 102–198, § 2(2), Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1623.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-650 · 104 Stat. 5093
  • 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-198 · 105 Stat. 1623

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-650 on 1990-12-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case