ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

29 U.S.C. § 1001b — Findings and declaration of policy

submitted 40 years ago by Pub. L. 99-272 to r/title-29-LABOR · 331 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress describes problems with single-employer defined-benefit pension plans and states policies for improving benefit protection and financing.

(a) Congress finds that single-employer defined-benefit pension plans substantially affect interstate commerce and have a national interest; directly affect the well-being and retirement income of millions of workers, retirees, and dependents; and need a sound termination-insurance system. Congress also finds that the current system sometimes encourages employers to end plans, avoid benefit obligations, and shift unfunded liabilities to the insurance system and its other premium payers. (b) Congress finds that changing the system and increasing premiums is desirable to improve the chance of full benefit payments and to transfer liabilities to the system only in severe hardship, and is necessary to keep premiums reasonable and properly finance current funding shortages and future obligations. (c) The policy of this title is to foster and facilitate interstate commerce; encourage maintaining and growing these plans; improve the chance that participants and beneficiaries receive full benefits; transfer unfunded liabilities to the insurance system only in severe hardship; keep premiums reasonable; and prudently finance current funding shortages and future obligations by increasing termination-insurance premiums.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1)

single-employer defined benefit pension plans have a substantial impact on interstate commerce and are affected with a national interest;

(2)

the continued well-being and retirement income security of millions of workers, retirees, and their dependents are directly affected by such plans;

(3)

the existence of a sound termination insurance system is fundamental to the retirement income security of participants and beneficiaries of such plans; and

(4)

the current termination insurance system in some instances encourages employers to terminate pension plans, evade their obligations to pay benefits, and shift unfunded pension liabilities onto the termination insurance system and the other premium-payers.

(b) Additional findings

The Congress further finds that modification of the current termination insurance system and an increase in the insurance premium for single-employer defined benefit pension plans—

(1)

is desirable to increase the likelihood that full benefits will be paid to participants and beneficiaries of such plans;

(2)

is desirable to provide for the transfer of liabilities to the termination insurance system only in cases of severe hardship;

(3)

is necessary to maintain the premium costs of such system at a reasonable level; and

(4)

is necessary to finance properly current funding deficiencies and future obligations of the single-employer pension plan termination insurance system.

(c) Declaration of policy

It is hereby declared to be the policy of this title—

(1)

to foster and facilitate interstate commerce;

(2)

to encourage the maintenance and growth of single-employer defined benefit pension plans;

(3)

to increase the likelihood that participants and beneficiaries under single-employer defined benefit pension plans will receive their full benefits;

(4)

to provide for the transfer of unfunded pension liabilities onto the single-employer pension plan termination insurance system only in cases of severe hardship;

(5)

to maintain the premium costs of such system at a reasonable level; and

(6)

to assure the prudent financing of current funding deficiencies and future obligations of the single-employer pension plan termination insurance system by increasing termination insurance premiums.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 99–272, title XI, § 11002, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 237.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1986Enacted · Pub. L. 99-272 · 100 Stat. 237

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-272 on 1986-04-07.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case