29 U.S.C. § 158a — Providing facilities for operations of Federal Credit Unions
submitted 89 years ago by ch. 3 to r/title-29-LABOR · 47 words · no verdicts yet
An employer can let a Federal Credit Union operate on its property. Doing this doesn't count as illegal interference with workers' union rights.
Normally, sections 157 and 158 of this title ban employers from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees' labor rights. This section creates one narrow exception.
If an employer* lets a Federal Credit Union use space on its premises to operate, that act alone does not count as intimidation, coercion, interference, restraint, or discrimination under those sections, or under any law that amended them.
Provision by an employer* of facilities for the operations of a Federal Credit Union on the premises of such employer shall not be deemed to be intimidation, coercion, interference, restraint or discrimination within the provisions of sections 157 and 158 of this title, or acts amendatory thereof.
Source credit: (Dec. 6, 1937, ch. 3, § 5, 51 Stat. 5.)
- 1937Enacted · Act of Dec. 6, 1937, ch. 3 · 51 Stat. 5
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 3 on 1937-12-06.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case