ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

30 U.S.C. § 2004 — National Research Council study

submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 106-193 to r/title-30-MINERAL-LANDS-AND-MINING · 87 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section addresses National Research Council study. It states the definitions, duties, permissions, limits, or procedures set out in the section.

(a) Agreement for Study The Secretary must offer to enter into an agreement with the National Research Council under which the National Research Council must— (1) conduct a study of the progress made under the methane hydrate research and development program implemented under this chapter; and (2) make recommendations for future methane hydrate research and development needs. (b) Report No later than September 30, 2009 , the Secretary must submit to Congress a report containing the findings and recommendations of the National Research Council under this section.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Agreement for Study

The Secretary shall offer to enter into an agreement with the National Research Council under which the National Research Council shall—

(1)

conduct a study of the progress made under the methane hydrate research and development program implemented under this chapter; and

(2)

make recommendations for future methane hydrate research and development needs.

(b) Report

Not later than September 30, 2009, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the findings and recommendations of the National Research Council under this section.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–193, § 5, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, § 968(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 898.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 106-193 · 119 Stat. 898

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-193 on 2005-08-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case