ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

30 U.S.C. § 27Mining tunnels; right to possession of veins on line with; abandonment of right

submitted date unrecorded by Congress to r/title-30-MINERAL-LANDS-AND-MINING · 139 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

If someone digs a mining tunnel, they get rights to veins or lodes they discover within 3,000 feet of the tunnel's face, along its line. Other people can't validly stake new claims on that same line while the tunnel is being actively worked. Stopping tunnel work for six months counts as giving up rights to any undiscovered veins along that line.

This is one undivided provision. When someone digs a tunnel to develop a vein or lode, or to discover mines, the tunnel's owners get the right to possess any veins or lodes within 3,000 feet of the tunnel's face, measured along the tunnel's line — as long as those veins or lodes weren't previously known to exist and are discovered through the tunnel. This right is the same as if the vein had been found from the surface. If someone else stakes a claim on the line of the tunnel, for a vein or lode not appearing on the surface, and they do this after the tunnel work started and while it's being prosecuted with reasonable diligence (steady effort), that new claim is invalid. But if the tunnel's owners fail to work on the tunnel for six months, the law treats that as an abandonment — a giving up — of their right to all undiscovered veins along the tunnel's line.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Where a tunnel is run for the development of a vein or lode, or for the discovery of mines, the owners of such tunnel shall have the right of possession of all veins or lodes within three thousand feet from the face of such tunnel on the line thereof, not previously known to exist, discovered in such tunnel, to the same extent as if discovered from the surface; and locations on the line of such tunnel of veins or lodes not appearing on the surface, made by other parties after the commencement of the tunnel, and while the same is being prosecuted with reasonable diligence, shall be invalid; but failure to prosecute the work on the tunnel for six months shall be considered as an abandonment of the right to all undiscovered veins on the line of such tunnel.

Source credit: (R.S. § 2323.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

A history note hasn’t been published yet.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case