ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

30 U.S.C. § 614Waiver of rights

submitted 71 years ago by ch. 375 to r/title-30-MINERAL-LANDS-AND-MINING · 154 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

An owner may waive rights under an earlier unpatented mining claim that conflict with section 612 limits. Recording the waiver applies those limits before patent without conceding priority or validity.

The owner may execute, acknowledge, and record a waiver and relinquishment where the claim's location record is kept. The claim then becomes subject before patent to section 612 limits as if located after July 23, 1955. The waiver does not concede priority or validity.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The owner or owners of any unpatented mining claim heretofore located may waive and relinquish all rights thereunder which are contrary to or in conflict with the limitations or restrictions specified in section 612 of this title as to hereafter located unpatented mining claims. The execution and acknowledgment of such a waiver and relinquishment by such owner or owners and the recordation thereof in the office where the notice or certificate of location of such mining claim is of record shall render such mining claim thereafter and prior to issuance of patent subject to the limitations and restrictions in section 612 of this title in all respects as if said mining claim had been located after July 23, 1955, but no such waiver or relinquishment shall be deemed in any manner to constitute any concession as to the date of priority of rights under said mining claim or as to the validity thereof.

Source credit: (July 23, 1955, ch. 375, § 6, 69 Stat. 372.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1955Enacted · Act of July 23, 1955, ch. 375 · 69 Stat. 372

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 375 on 1955-07-23.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case