ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 11Authority for compact between Middle Northwest States as to jurisdiction of offenses committed on boundary waters

submitted 105 years ago by ch. 176 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 185 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress lets North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska make agreements about crimes on their shared border waters. Any two or more of these states can decide who has jurisdiction. Congress already approved Minnesota and South Dakota's specific agreement.

Congress consents to letting the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska -- any two or more of them -- enter into an agreement or compact. These states can use the agreement, or matching laws passed by two or more of them, to decide which state has jurisdiction over crimes committed on the waters that form their shared borders, or on waters that those border lines pass through. This power cannot be used in a way that conflicts with the Constitution or any federal law. Congress specifically consents to the shared jurisdiction that Minnesota and South Dakota already agreed to, through a Minnesota law passed April 20, 1917, and a South Dakota law passed February 13, 1917.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The consent of the Congress is given to the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska, or any two or more of them, by such agreement or compact as they may deem desirable or necessary, or as may be evidenced by legislative acts enacted by any two or more of said States, not in conflict with the Constitution of the United States or any law thereof, to determine and settle the jurisdiction to be exercised by said States, respectively, over offenses arising out of the violation of the laws of any of said States upon any of the waters forming the boundary lines between any two or more of said States, or waters through which such boundary line extends, and that the consent of the Congress be, and the same is, given to the concurrent jurisdiction agreed to by the States of Minnesota and South Dakota, as evidenced by the act of the Legislature of the State of Minnesota approved April 20, 1917, and the act of the Legislature of the State of South Dakota approved February 13, 1917.

Source credit: (Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 176, 41 Stat. 1447.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1921Enacted · Act of Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 176 · 41 Stat. 1447

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 176 on 1921-03-04.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case