33 U.S.C. § 1268 — Great Lakes
submitted 78 years ago by Pub. L. 100-4 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 5,084 words · no verdicts yet
This section organizes Federal work to protect and restore the Great Lakes and carry out the United States’ duties under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. It establishes offices, plans, monitoring, grants, project rules, reporting duties, and funding authorizations.
(a) Findings, purpose, and definitions.
(1) Findings. Congress finds that the Great Lakes are a valuable national resource that provides food, fresh water, recreation, beauty, and enjoyment to people in the United States and other nations. The United States should pursue the goals of the 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended in 1987 and by later agreements and amendments, especially its goals concerning toxic pollutants. The Environmental Protection Agency should lead that effort with other Federal agencies and State* and local authorities.
(2) Purpose. This section aims to meet those Agreement goals through better organization and definition of the Agency’s mission, State grants for pollution* control in the Great Lakes area, and better accountability for carrying out the Agreement.
(3) Definitions. “Agency” means the Environmental Protection Agency. “Great Lakes” means Lakes Ontario, Erie, Huron (including Lake St. Clair), Michigan, and Superior, and the connecting Saint Mary’s, Saint Clair, Detroit, Niagara, and Saint Lawrence Rivers up to the Canadian Border. “Great Lakes System” means all streams, rivers, lakes, and other waters in the Great Lakes drainage basin. “Program Office” means the Great Lakes National Program Office established here. “Research Office” means the office established under subsection (d). “Area of concern” means a Great Lakes geographic area where beneficial uses are impaired and which Annex 2 of the Agreement officially designates. “Great Lakes States” means Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. “Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement” means the 1978 agreement between the United States and Canada, as amended by the 1987 Protocol. “Lakewide Management Plan” means a written, systematic, comprehensive ecosystem plan for restoring and protecting beneficial uses of the open waters of a Great Lake under article VI and Annex 2. “Remedial Action Plan” means such a plan for areas of concern. “Site characterization” means monitoring and evaluating the nature and extent of sediment contamination under EPA guidance for contaminated sediment in a United States area of concern. “Potentially responsible party” means an individual or entity that may be liable under Federal or State authority being used or that may be used to help clean up and protect the Great Lakes.
(b) Great Lakes National Program Office. The previously established Great Lakes National Program Office is established within the Agency. A Director must head it. The Director must be highly qualified, because of management experience and technical expertise about the Great Lakes, to direct programs and plans on various Great Lakes issues. The office must be in a Great Lakes State.
(c) Great Lakes management.
(1) Functions. The Program Office shall develop and carry out specific action plans for United States responsibilities under the Agreement, working with appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and international agencies and following section 1251(e). It shall establish a systemwide surveillance network to monitor Great Lakes water quality, especially toxic pollutants; act as liaison with and provide information to the Canadian members of the International Joint Commission and Canada’s counterpart agency; coordinate Agency headquarters and regional actions to improve Great Lakes water quality; and coordinate Agency actions with other Federal agencies and State and local authorities so they can help develop strategies and support the Agreement’s objectives.
(2) Great Lakes water quality guidance. (A) By June 30, 1991, the Administrator, after consulting the Program Office, shall publish proposed Great Lakes System water-quality guidance in the Federal Register for public notice and comment. It must follow the Agreement, be at least as restrictive as this chapter and national criteria and guidance, set numerical pollutant* limits in ambient Great Lakes waters to protect human health, aquatic life, and wildlife, and guide the States on minimum standards, antidegradation policies, and implementation procedures. (B) By June 30, 1992, the Administrator, consulting the Program Office and using authority under this chapter, shall publish final guidance in the Federal Register. (C) Within two years after publication, the Great Lakes States shall adopt consistent standards, policies, and procedures. If a State does not, the Administrator shall promulgate them by the end of that period. When reviewing a State water-quality plan, the Agency shall consider the State’s compliance with the guidance.
(3) Remedial Action Plans. (A) For each United States-drafted area-of-concern plan, the Program Office shall ensure that the State submits it to the Program Office by June 30, 1991, to the International Joint Commission by January 1, 1992, and into the State water-quality plan by January 1, 1993. (B) For each Canada-drafted plan, the Office shall work with Canada to ensure submission to the Commission by June 30, 1991, and finalization by January 1, 1993. (C) For an area designated after November 16, 1990, a United States plan must reach the Program Office within two years, the Commission within six months after that submission, and the State water-quality plan within one year after Commission submission. A Canada-drafted plan must reach the Commission within two years and be finalized within 18 months after submission. (D) The Office shall collect the Commission’s formal comments on individual plans and, on request, let the public inspect and copy them. It shall also provide EPA’s formal comments on request. (E) Within one year after November 27, 2002, the Administrator shall report to Congress on the actions, time periods, and resources needed for the Agency’s oversight duties under this paragraph and the Agreement.
(4) Lakewide Management Plans. After consulting the Program Office, the Administrator shall publish a proposed Lake Michigan plan and seek comments by January 1, 1992; submit it to the Commission by January 1, 1993; and publish a final plan and begin implementation by January 1, 1994. This does not prevent simultaneous plans for other Great Lakes.
(5) Spills. With the Coast Guard, the Office shall identify Great Lakes areas likely to have numerous or large oil or hazardous-material spills from land facilities, vessels, or other sources. With the States, it shall identify weaknesses in Federal and State prevention and response programs and systems. The information must be in the report required by this section at least every two years.
(6) Five-year nutrients program. With the States, the Office shall develop a five-year plan and program to reduce nutrients entering the Great Lakes. It must include any section 1329 nonpoint-source nutrient-runoff program and monitoring of runoff entering the Lakes and ambient nutrient levels.
(7) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. (A) The Agency has a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative for protection and restoration programs and projects. (B) The Administrator shall prioritize, with non-Federal partners, projects addressing the Initiative Action Plan’s priorities: toxic substances and areas of concern; invasive species and their impacts; nearshore health and nonpoint-source pollution; habitat and wildlife, including wetland restoration and preservation; and accountability, monitoring, evaluation, communication, and partnerships. (C) The Administrator shall work with Federal partners, including the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force, to select combinations of projects using criteria including measurable strategic environmental results implementing the Action Plan and Agreement; prompt implementation, timely results, and leveraging resources; and better coordination and less duplication. The Administrator shall consult Great Lakes States and Indian tribes and seek other non-Federal input. The Administrator shall designate an appropriate Federal-partner coordinator for Initiative harmful-algal-bloom projects with those partners, States, tribes, and stakeholders.
(D) Initiative funds shall strategically implement Federal projects; projects coordinated with States, tribes, municipalities, higher-education institutions, and other organizations; and Program Office operations, including sediment remediation in areas of concern, subject to subparagraph (J)(ii). Each year the Administrator may, with the receiving head’s agreement, transfer no more than the amount appropriated under (J)(i) to a Federal department or agency, and may make an interagency agreement for those activities. The Administrator or a receiving agency head may grant funds or make agreements with a qualified non-Federal entity for planning, research, monitoring, outreach, or implementation of a selected project supporting the Action Plan or Agreement. Such an entity may be a governmental entity, nonprofit, institution, or individual.
(E) Projects may be local, Great Lakes-wide, or basin-wide. Initiative funds may not pay for water infrastructure that receives assistance from a State water-pollution revolving fund, a State drinking-water revolving loan fund under title 42 section 300j–12, or the 2014 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. The exception is a green-infrastructure project improving Great Lakes habitat and other ecosystem functions. (F) Each relevant Federal agency shall, as practicable, maintain its base Great Lakes funding without counting Initiative funds and identify new activities and projects supporting the Initiative’s environmental goals. (G) At least every five years, the Administrator and Task Force shall review and appropriately revise the Action Plan. The Administrator shall consult States and tribes and seek other non-Federal input. (H) The Administrator shall monitor and periodically report publicly on progress, put information about each Action Plan project on a public website, and annually give the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and Senate Environment and Public Works Committee a detailed progress report and amounts transferred to Federal agencies. (I) “Initiative Action Plan” means the comprehensive, multiyear Great Lakes restoration plan first developed under the 2010 Interior and related agencies appropriations conference statement. (J) Appropriations are authorized at $300 million for each fiscal year 2017–2021, $375 million for 2022, $400 million for 2023, $425 million for 2024, $450 million for 2025, and $475 million for 2026. Nothing in this paragraph creates, expands, or changes the Administrator’s authority under this section, the Action Plan, or the Agreement.
(8) The Administrator shall ensure that the Program Office makes agreements with Agency organizational elements and appropriate State agencies that specifically state each element’s Great Lakes duties and responsibilities, the time periods, and the resources committed.
(9) The Agency’s annual budget submission shall separately request Program Office funding.
(10) Confined disposal facilities. (A) Within one year after November 16, 1990, the Administrator, consulting the Army Assistant Secretary for Civil Works, shall develop and carry out management plans for every Great Lakes confined disposal facility. (B) Each plan shall provide for monitoring water quality at and around the site, sediment quality at and around the site, the diversity, productivity, and stability of aquatic organisms at and around the site, and other conditions the Administrator finds appropriate. (C) It shall state the expected use and management of the site for the next 20 years, including expected end of dumping and the need for management and pollution control afterward. (D) It shall set review and revision schedules no less often than five years after adoption and every five years thereafter.
(11) Sediment remediation in areas of concern. (A) Through the Program Office, the Administrator may carry out projects meeting (B). (B) An eligible project is in a United States area of concern and monitors or evaluates contaminated sediment; implements a contaminated-sediment remediation plan, including related aquatic-habitat restoration; or prevents further or renewed sediment contamination. (C) The Administrator shall prioritize projects that are remedial action, are identified in a submitted and ready Remedial Action Plan, use an innovative approach that may provide greater or equally effective benefits at lower cost, or begin remediation within one year after receiving funds. (D) The Administrator may not remediate sediment where alternatives have not been evaluated, including short- and long-term effects on health and the environment; where significant further or renewed contamination from existing sources is likely after the project; without a written agreement from every non-Federal sponsor covering its responsibilities; or without assurance that the Agency made a reasonable inquiry to identify potentially responsible parties connected to the site. (E) The non-Federal share must be at least 35 percent. It may include an in-kind contribution. An agreement may credit an integral material or service. If the sponsor is to receive credit for work not done by October 8, 2008, the parties must agree first, and only later work qualifies. Credit cannot exceed the non-Federal share or the actual reasonable material and service costs. In-kind contributions may include sponsor-provided planning, data collection, design, construction, and materials. Credit may be used for another project by the same sponsor in the same area of concern. The share may include money or in-kind work under an administrative order on consent or judicial consent decree, but not under a unilateral administrative order or court order. The sponsor pays 100 percent of operation and maintenance costs. (F) The Administrator, consulting affected States or local governments, shall pay Federal costs for one site characterization per discrete site in a remediation project. (G) The Administrator shall coordinate with the Army Secretary and project-State Governors to use Federal and State assistance efficiently. (H) An additional $50 million per year is authorized for fiscal years 2004–2010, available until spent; no more than 20 percent may pay for site characterization.
(12) Public information. Through the Program Office and with States, tribes, local governments, and others, the Administrator may provide the public information about sediment remediation in United States areas of concern. One million dollars per year is authorized for fiscal years 2004–2010.
(d) Great Lakes research. (1) NOAA shall have a Great Lakes Research Office. (2) It shall identify Great Lakes resource issues needing research and report them to Congress before each fiscal year ends, including changes in the system concerning those issues. (3) It shall identify and inventory Federal, State, university, and tribal environmental research programs, and when feasible private and foreign programs, and update the inventory every four years. (4) It shall establish a research exchange to quickly identify, obtain, retrieve, share, and use information about completed and ongoing projects affecting the System. (5) With the Coordination Office, it shall develop a comprehensive research program and database including water quality, fisheries, and biota data. (6) Through named Federal laboratories, the Sea Grant program, and the private sector, it shall conduct appropriate research and monitoring on priority and current Great Lakes needs. (7) It shall be in a Great Lakes State.
(e) Research and management coordination. (1) Before October 1 each year, the two offices shall prepare a joint research plan for the next calendar year’s fiscal year. (2) The plan shall identify proposed Agreement research, state Agency research priorities needed to fulfill the Agreement, and proposed research usable for a comprehensive System database, with database-development priorities. (3) By September 30, 1994, the Program Office, consulting the Research Office, ATSDR, and Great Lakes States, shall report to Congress on harmful effects of Great Lakes pollutants on people in the States and on fish, shellfish, and wildlife. The Administrator may use cooperative agreements with States. Up to $3 million per year is authorized for fiscal years 1992–1994.
(f) Interagency cooperation. Each Federal department, agency, or instrumentality engaged in, concerned with, or authorized over Great Lakes research, monitoring, or planning shall annually report to the Administrator on activities affecting compliance with the Agreement. This includes the Army Chief of Engineers, Soil Conservation Service Chief, Coast Guard Commandant, Fish and Wildlife Service Director, and NOAA Administrator.
(g) Existing authority. Nothing affects Federal, State, or tribal jurisdiction, powers, or prerogatives, treaty-created international bodies’ powers concerning the Lakes, or other Federal or State authority used or usable for Great Lakes cleanup and protection.
(h) Appropriations. Up to $11 million per year is authorized for fiscal years 1987–1990 and $25 million for 1991; necessary sums for 1992–2003; and $25 million per year for 2004–2008.
The Congress finds that—
the Great Lakes are a valuable national resource, continuously serving the people of the United States and other nations as an important source of food, fresh water, recreation, beauty, and enjoyment;
the United States should seek to attain the goals embodied in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments, with particular emphasis on goals related to toxic pollutants; and
the Environmental Protection Agency should take the lead in the effort to meet those goals, working with other Federal agencies and State* and local authorities.
It is the purpose of this section to achieve the goals embodied in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments, through improved organization and definition of mission on the part of the Agency, funding of State grants for pollution* control in the Great Lakes area, and improved accountability for implementation of such agreement.
For purposes of this section, the term—
“Agency” means the Environmental Protection Agency;
“Great Lakes” means Lake Ontario, Lake Erie, Lake Huron (including Lake St. Clair), Lake Michigan, and Lake Superior, and the connecting channels (Saint Mary’s River, Saint Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, and Saint Lawrence River to the Canadian Border);
“Great Lakes System” means all the streams, rivers, lakes, and other bodies of water within the drainage basin of the Great Lakes;
“Program Office” means the Great Lakes National Program Office established by this section;
“Research Office” means the Great Lakes Research Office established by subsection (d);
“area of concern” means a geographic area located within the Great Lakes, in which beneficial uses are impaired and which has been officially designated as such under Annex 2 of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement;
“Great Lakes States” means the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin;
“Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement” means the bilateral agreement, between the United States and Canada which was signed in 1978 and amended by the Protocol of 1987;
“Lakewide Management Plan” means a written document which embodies a systematic and comprehensive ecosystem approach to restoring and protecting the beneficial uses of the open waters of each of the Great Lakes, in accordance with article VI and Annex 2 of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement;
“Remedial Action Plan” means a written document which embodies a systematic and comprehensive ecosystem approach to restoring and protecting the beneficial uses of areas of concern, in accordance with article VI and Annex 2 of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement;
“site characterization” means a process for monitoring and evaluating the nature and extent of sediment contamination in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s guidance for the assessment of contaminated sediment in an area of concern located wholly or partially within the United States; and
“potentially responsible party” means an individual or entity that may be liable under any Federal or State authority that is being used or may be used to facilitate the cleanup and protection of the Great Lakes.
The Great Lakes National Program Office (previously established by the Administrator) is hereby established within the Agency. The Program Office shall be headed by a Director who, by reason of management experience and technical expertise relating to the Great Lakes, is highly qualified to direct the development of programs and plans on a variety of Great Lakes issues. The Great Lakes National Program Office shall be located in a Great Lakes State.
The Program Office shall—
in cooperation with appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and international agencies, and in accordance with section 1251(e) of this title, develop and implement specific action plans to carry out the responsibilities of the United States under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments,; 1
establish a Great Lakes system-wide surveillance network to monitor the water quality of the Great Lakes, with specific emphasis on the monitoring of toxic pollutants;
serve as the liaison with, and provide information to, the Canadian members of the International Joint Commission and the Canadian counterpart to the Agency;
coordinate actions of the Agency (including actions by headquarters and regional offices thereof) aimed at improving Great Lakes water quality; and
coordinate actions of the Agency with the actions of other Federal agencies and State and local authorities, so as to ensure the input of those agencies and authorities in developing water quality strategies and obtain the support of those agencies and authorities in achieving the objectives of such agreement.
By June 30, 1991, the Administrator, after consultation with the Program Office, shall publish in the Federal Register for public notice and comment proposed water quality guidance for the Great Lakes System. Such guidance shall conform with the objectives and provisions of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, shall be no less restrictive than the provisions of this chapter and national water quality criteria and guidance, shall specify numerical limits on pollutants in ambient Great Lakes waters to protect human health, aquatic life, and wildlife, and shall provide guidance to the Great Lakes States on minimum water quality standards*, antidegradation policies, and implementation procedures for the Great Lakes System.
By June 30, 1992, the Administrator, in consultation with the Program Office, shall publish in the Federal Register, pursuant to this section and the Administrator’s authority under this chapter, final water quality guidance for the Great Lakes System.
Within two years after such Great Lakes guidance is published, the Great Lakes States shall adopt water quality standards, antidegradation policies, and implementation procedures for waters within the Great Lakes System which are consistent with such guidance. If a Great Lakes State fails to adopt such standards, policies, and procedures, the Administrator shall promulgate them not later than the end of such two-year period. When reviewing any Great Lakes State’s water quality plan, the agency shall consider the extent to which the State has complied with the Great Lakes guidance issued pursuant to this section.
For each area of concern for which the United States has agreed to draft a Remedial Action Plan, the Program Office shall ensure that the Great Lakes State in which such area of concern is located—
submits a Remedial Action Plan to the Program Office by June 30, 1991;
submits such Remedial Action Plan to the International Joint Commission by January 1, 1992; and
includes such Remedial Action Plans within the State’s water quality plan by January 1, 1993.
For each area of concern for which Canada has agreed to draft a Remedial Action Plan, the Program Office shall, pursuant to subparagraph (c)(1)(C) of this section, work with Canada to assure the submission of such Remedial Action Plans to the International Joint Commission by June 30, 1991, and to finalize such Remedial Action Plans by January 1, 1993.
For any area of concern designated as such subsequent to November 16, 1990, the Program Office shall (i) if the United States has agreed to draft the Remedial Action Plan, ensure that the Great Lakes State in which such area of concern is located submits such Plan to the Program Office within two years of the area’s designation, submits it to the International Joint Commission no later than six months after submitting it to the Program Office, and includes such Plan in the State’s water quality plan no later than one year after submitting it to the Commission; and (ii) if Canada has agreed to draft the Remedial Action Plan, work with Canada, pursuant to subparagraph (c)(1)(C) of this section, to ensure the submission of such Plan to the International Joint Commission within two years of the area’s designation and the finalization of such Plan no later than eighteen months after submitting it to such Commission.
The Program Office shall compile formal comments on individual Remedial Action Plans made by the International Joint Commission pursuant to section 4(d) of Annex 2 of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and, upon request by a member of the public, shall make such comments available for inspection and copying. The Program Office shall also make available, upon request, formal comments made by the Environmental Protection Agency on individual Remedial Action Plans.
Not later than 1 year after November 27, 2002, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report on such actions, time periods, and resources as are necessary to fulfill the duties of the Agency relating to oversight of Remedial Action Plans under—
this paragraph; and
the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
The Administrator, in consultation with the Program Office shall—
by January 1, 1992, publish in the Federal Register a proposed Lakewide Management Plan for Lake Michigan and solicit public comments;
by January 1, 1993, submit a proposed Lakewide Management Plan for Lake Michigan to the International Joint Commission for review; and
by January 1, 1994, publish in the Federal Register a final Lakewide Management Plan for Lake Michigan and begin implementation.
Nothing in this subparagraph 2 shall preclude the simultaneous development of Lakewide Management Plans for the other Great Lakes.
The Program Office, in consultation with the Coast Guard, shall identify areas within the Great Lakes which are likely to experience numerous or voluminous spills of oil or other hazardous materials from land based facilities, vessels, or other sources and, in consultation with the Great Lakes States, shall identify weaknesses in Federal and State programs and systems to prevent and respond to such spills. This information shall be included on at least a biennial basis in the report required by this section.
The Program Office shall develop, in consultation with the States, a five-year plan and program for reducing the amount of nutrients introduced into the Great Lakes. Such program shall incorporate any management program for reducing nutrient runoff from nonpoint sources established under section 1329 of this title and shall include a program for monitoring nutrient runoff into, and ambient levels in, the Great Lakes.
There is established in the Agency a Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (referred to in this paragraph as the “Initiative”) to carry out programs and projects for Great Lakes protection and restoration.
In carrying out the Initiative, the Administrator shall prioritize programs and projects, to be carried out in coordination with non-Federal partners, that address the priority areas described in the Initiative Action Plan, including—
the remediation of toxic substances and areas of concern;
the prevention and control of invasive species and the impacts of invasive species;
the protection and restoration of nearshore health and the prevention and mitigation of nonpoint source pollution;
habitat and wildlife protection and restoration, including wetlands restoration and preservation; and
accountability, monitoring, evaluation, communication, and partnership activities.
In carrying out the Initiative, the Administrator shall collaborate with other Federal partners, including the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force established by Executive Order No. 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043), to select the best combination of programs and projects for Great Lakes protection and restoration using appropriate principles and criteria, including whether a program or project provides—
the ability to achieve strategic and measurable environmental outcomes that implement the Initiative Action Plan and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement;
the feasibility of—
prompt implementation;
timely achievement of results; and
resource leveraging; and
the opportunity to improve interagency, intergovernmental, and interorganizational coordination and collaboration to reduce duplication and streamline efforts.
In selecting the best combination of programs and projects for Great Lakes protection and restoration under clause (i), the Administrator shall consult with the Great Lakes States and Indian tribes and solicit input from other non-Federal stakeholders.
The Administrator shall designate a point person* from an appropriate Federal partner to coordinate, with Federal partners and Great Lakes States, Indian tribes, and other non-Federal stakeholders, projects and activities under the Initiative involving harmful algal blooms in the Great Lakes.
Subject to subparagraph (J)(ii), funds made available to carry out the Initiative shall be used to strategically implement—
Federal projects;
projects carried out in coordination with States, Indian tribes, municipalities, institutions of higher education, and other organizations; and
operations and activities of the Program Office, including remediation of sediment contamination in areas of concern.
With amounts made available for the Initiative each fiscal year, the Administrator may—
transfer not more than the total amount appropriated under subparagraph (J)(i) for the fiscal year to the head of any Federal department or agency, with the concurrence of the department or agency head, to carry out activities to support the Initiative and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement; and
enter into an interagency agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency to carry out activities described in subclause (I).
The Administrator, or the head of any other Federal department or agency receiving funds under clause (ii)(I), may make a grant to, or otherwise enter into an agreement with, a qualified non-Federal entity, as determined by the Administrator or the applicable head of the other Federal department or agency receiving funds, for planning, research, monitoring, outreach, or implementation of a project selected under subparagraph (C), to support the Initiative Action Plan or the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
For purposes of this clause, a qualified non-Federal entity may include a governmental entity, nonprofit organization, institution, or individual.
Projects may be carried out under the Initiative on multiple levels, including—
locally;
Great Lakes-wide; or
Great Lakes basin-wide.
No funds made available to carry out the Initiative may be used for any water infrastructure activity (other than a green infrastructure* project that improves habitat and other ecosystem functions in the Great Lakes) for which financial assistance is received—
from a State water pollution control revolving fund established under subchapter VI;
from a State drinking water revolving loan fund established under section 300j–12 of title 42; or
pursuant to the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.).
Each relevant Federal department or agency shall, to the maximum extent practicable—
maintain the base level of funding for the Great Lakes activities of that department or agency without regard to funding under the Initiative; and
identify new activities and projects to support the environmental goals of the Initiative.
Not less often than once every 5 years, the Administrator, in conjunction with the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force, shall review, and revise as appropriate, the Initiative Action Plan to guide the activities of the Initiative in addressing the restoration and protection of the Great Lakes system.
In reviewing and revising the Initiative Action Plan under clause (i), the Administrator shall consult with the Great Lakes States and Indian tribes and solicit input from other non-Federal stakeholders.
The Administrator shall—
establish and maintain a process for monitoring and periodically reporting to the public on the progress made in implementing the Initiative Action Plan;
make information about each project carried out under the Initiative Action Plan available on a public website; and
provide to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a yearly detailed description of the progress of the Initiative and amounts transferred to participating Federal departments and agencies under subparagraph (D)(ii).
In this paragraph, the term “Initiative Action Plan” means the comprehensive, multiyear action plan for the restoration of the Great Lakes, first developed pursuant to the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Conference Report accompanying the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–88).
There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this paragraph—
$300,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021;
$375,000,000 for fiscal year 2022;
$400,000,000 for fiscal year 2023;
$425,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;
$450,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; and
$475,000,000 for fiscal year 2026.
Nothing in this paragraph creates, expands, or amends the authority of the Administrator to implement programs or projects under—
this section;
the Initiative Action Plan; or
the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
The Administrator shall ensure that the Program Office enters into agreements with the various organizational elements of the Agency involved in Great Lakes activities and the appropriate State agencies specifically delineating—
the duties and responsibilities of each such element in the Agency with respect to the Great Lakes;
the time periods for carrying out such duties and responsibilities; and
the resources to be committed to such duties and responsibilities.
The Administrator shall, in the Agency’s annual budget submission to Congress, include a funding request for the Program Office as a separate budget line item.
The Administrator, in consultation with the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, shall develop and implement, within one year of November 16, 1990, management plans for every Great Lakes confined disposal facility.
The plan shall provide for monitoring of such facilities, including—
water quality at the site and in the area of the site;
sediment quality at the site and in the area of the site;
the diversity, productivity, and stability of aquatic organisms at the site and in the area of the site; and
such other conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate.
The plan shall identify the anticipated use and management of the site over the following twenty-year period including the expected termination of dumping at the site, the anticipated need for site management, including pollution control, following the termination of the use of the site.
The plan shall identify a schedule for review and revision of the plan which shall not be less frequent than five years after adoption of the plan and every five years thereafter.
In accordance with this paragraph, the Administrator, acting through the Program Office, may carry out projects that meet the requirements of subparagraph (B).
A project meets the requirements of this subparagraph if the project is to be carried out in an area of concern located wholly or partially in the United States and the project—
monitors or evaluates contaminated sediment;
subject to subparagraph (D), implements a plan to remediate contaminated sediment, including activities to restore aquatic habitat that are carried out in conjunction with a project for the remediation of contaminated sediment; or
prevents further or renewed contamination of sediment.
In selecting projects to carry out under this paragraph, the Administrator shall give priority to a project that—
constitutes remedial action for contaminated sediment;
has been identified in a Remedial Action Plan submitted under paragraph (3); and
is ready to be implemented;
will use an innovative approach, technology, or technique that may provide greater environmental benefits, or equivalent environmental benefits at a reduced cost; or
includes remediation to be commenced not later than 1 year after the date of receipt of funds for the project.
The Administrator may not carry out a project under this paragraph for remediation of contaminated sediments located in an area of concern—
if an evaluation of remedial alternatives for the area of concern has not been conducted, including a review of the short-term and long-term effects of the alternatives on human health and the environment;
if the Administrator determines that the area of concern is likely to suffer significant further or renewed contamination from existing sources of pollutants causing sediment contamination following completion of the project;
unless each non-Federal sponsor for the project has entered into a written project agreement with the Administrator under which the party agrees to carry out its responsibilities and requirements for the project; or
unless the Administrator provides assurance that the Agency has conducted a reasonable inquiry to identify potentially responsible parties connected with the site.
The non-Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this paragraph shall be at least 35 percent.
The non-Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this paragraph may include the value of an in-kind contribution provided by a non-Federal sponsor.
A project agreement described in subparagraph (D)(iii) may provide, with respect to a project, that the Administrator shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the value of an in-kind contribution made by the non-Federal sponsor, if the Administrator determines that the material or service provided as the in-kind contribution is integral to the project.
In any case in which a non-Federal sponsor is to receive credit under subclause (II) for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal sponsor and such work has not been carried out by the non-Federal sponsor as of October 8, 2008, the Administrator and the non-Federal sponsor shall enter into an agreement under which the non-Federal sponsor shall carry out such work, and only work carried out following the execution of the agreement shall be eligible for credit.
Credit authorized under this clause for a project carried out under this paragraph—
shall not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of the project; and
shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs of the materials and services provided by the non-Federal sponsor, as determined by the Administrator.
In this subparagraph, the term “in-kind contribution” may include the costs of planning (including data collection), design, construction, and materials that are provided by the non-Federal sponsor for implementation of a project under this paragraph.
Any credit provided under this subparagraph towards the non-Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this paragraph may be applied towards the non-Federal share of the cost of any other project carried out under this paragraph by the same non-Federal sponsor for a site within the same area of concern.
The non-Federal share of the cost of a project carried out under this paragraph—
may include monies paid pursuant to, or the value of any in-kind contribution performed under, an administrative order on consent or judicial consent decree; but
may not include any funds paid pursuant to, or the value of any in-kind contribution performed under, a unilateral administrative order or court order.
The non-Federal share of the cost of the operation and maintenance of a project carried out under this paragraph shall be 100 percent.
The Administrator, in consultation with any affected State or unit of local government, shall carry out at Federal expense the site characterization of a project under this paragraph for the remediation of contaminated sediment.
For purposes of clause (i), the Administrator may carry out one site assessment per discrete site within a project at Federal expense.
In carrying out projects under this paragraph, the Administrator shall coordinate with the Secretary of the Army, and with the Governors of States in which the projects are located, to ensure that Federal and State assistance for remediation in areas of concern is used as efficiently as practicable.
In addition to other amounts authorized under this section, there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this paragraph $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2010.
Funds made available under clause (i) shall remain available until expended.
Not more than 20 percent of the funds appropriated pursuant to clause (i) for a fiscal year may be used to carry out subparagraph (F).
The Administrator, acting through the Program Office and in coordination with States, Indian tribes, local governments, and other entities, may carry out a public information program to provide information relating to the remediation of contaminated sediment to the public in areas of concern that are located wholly or partially in the United States.
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this paragraph $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2010.
There is established within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration the Great Lakes Research Office.
The Research Office shall identify issues relating to the Great Lakes resources on which research is needed. The Research Office shall submit a report to Congress on such issues before the end of each fiscal year which shall identify any changes in the Great Lakes system 3 with respect to such issues.
The Research Office shall identify and inventory Federal, State, university, and tribal environmental research programs (and, to the extent feasible, those of private organizations and other nations) relating to the Great Lakes system,3 and shall update that inventory every four years.
The Research Office shall establish a Great Lakes research exchange for the purpose of facilitating the rapid identification, acquisition, retrieval, dissemination, and use of information concerning research projects which are ongoing or completed and which affect the Great Lakes System.
The Research Office shall develop, in cooperation with the Coordination Office, a comprehensive environmental research program and data base for the Great Lakes system.3 The data base shall include, but not be limited to, data relating to water quality, fisheries, and biota.
The Research Office shall conduct, through the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, the National Sea Grant College program, other Federal laboratories, and the private sector, appropriate research and monitoring activities which address priority issues and current needs relating to the Great Lakes.
The Research Office shall be located in a Great Lakes State.
Before October 1 of each year, the Program Office and the Research Office shall prepare a joint research plan for the fiscal year which begins in the following calendar year.
Each plan prepared under paragraph (1) shall—
identify all proposed research dedicated to activities conducted under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments,; 1
include the Agency’s assessment of priorities for research needed to fulfill the terms of such Agreement; and
identify all proposed research that may be used to develop a comprehensive environmental data base for the Great Lakes System and establish priorities for development of such data base.
Not later than September 30, 1994, the Program Office, in consultation with the Research Office, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and Great Lakes States shall submit to the Congress a report assessing the adverse effects of water pollutants in the Great Lakes System on the health of persons in Great Lakes States and the health of fish, shellfish, and wildlife in the Great Lakes System. In conducting research in support of this report, the Administrator may, where appropriate, provide for research to be conducted under cooperative agreements with Great Lakes States.
There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator to carry out this section not to exceed $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994.
The head of each department, agency, or other instrumentality of the Federal Government which is engaged in, is concerned with, or has authority over programs relating to research, monitoring, and planning to maintain, enhance, preserve, or rehabilitate the environmental quality and natural resources of the Great Lakes, including the Chief of Engineers of the Army, the Chief of the Soil Conservation Service, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, shall submit an annual report to the Administrator with respect to the activities of that agency or office affecting compliance with the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments,.1
Nothing in this section shall be construed—
to affect the jurisdiction, powers, or prerogatives of any department, agency, or officer of the Federal Government or of any State government, or of any tribe, nor any powers, jurisdiction, or prerogatives of any international body created by treaty with authority relating to the Great Lakes; or
to affect any other Federal or State authority that is being used or may be used to facilitate the cleanup and protection of the Great Lakes.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator to carry out this section not to exceed—
$11,000,000 per fiscal year for the fiscal years 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990, and $25,000,000 for fiscal year 1991;
such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 1992 through 2003; and
$25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2008.
Source credit: (June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, § 118, as added Pub. L. 100–4, title I, § 104, Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 11; amended Pub. L. 100–688, title I, § 1008, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4151; Pub. L. 101–596, title I, §§ 101–106, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3000–3004; Pub. L. 107–303, title I, §§ 102–105, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2355–2358; Pub. L. 110–365, §§ 2, 3, Oct. 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 4021; Pub. L. 113–188, title VII, § 701, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2019; Pub. L. 114–113, div. G, title IV, § 426, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2581; Pub. L. 114–322, title IV, § 5005, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1889; Pub. L. 116–294, § 2, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4899.)
- 1948Enacted · Pub. L. 100-4 · 101 Stat. 11
- 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-688 · 102 Stat. 4151
- 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-596 · 104 Stat. 3000
- 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-303 · 116 Stat. 2355
- 2008Amended · Pub. L. 110-365 · 122 Stat. 4021
- 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-188 · 128 Stat. 2019
- 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-113 · 129 Stat. 2581
- 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-322 · 130 Stat. 1889
- 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-294 · 134 Stat. 4899
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 100-4 on 1948-06-30.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case