ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 1272Environmental dredging

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-640 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 375 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section allows the Secretary to remove and remediate contaminated sediment in navigable waters for specified navigation, environmental, and water-quality purposes. It sets sponsor cost sharing, planning requirements, priority locations, and nonprofit eligibility.

(a) Navigation projects. When needed to meet the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Secretary, consulting EPA’s Administrator, may remove and remediate contaminated sediment outside and next to a navigation channel as part of operating and maintaining a navigation project. (b) Other projects. (1) The Secretary may remove and remediate contaminated sediment from United States navigable waters for environmental enhancement and better water quality when a non-Federal sponsor requests it and agrees to pay 35 percent of the cost. (2) The Secretary may spend no more than $50 million in one fiscal year under this subsection. (c) Joint plan. The Secretary may act under subsection (b) only under a joint plan made with interested Federal, State, and local officials. The plan must allow public comment, describe the work, state the dredged-material disposal method, state the Secretary’s and sponsors’ roles and responsibilities, and identify funding sources. (d) Disposal costs. Disposal costs for sediment removed under this section shall be shared as a construction cost. (e) No change to other law. This section does not change any person’s rights or responsibilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. (f) Priority work. The Secretary shall prioritize work at Brooklyn Waterfront; Buffalo Harbor and River; Ashtabula River; Mahoning River; Lower Fox River; Passaic River and Newark Bay; Snake Creek in Bixby; and Willamette River, in the States named in the section. (g) Nonprofits. Despite title 42 section 1962d–5b, a project’s non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit entity if the affected local government agrees.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Operation and maintenance of navigation projects

Whenever necessary to meet the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.], the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may remove and remediate, as part of operation and maintenance of a navigation project, contaminated sediments outside the boundaries of and adjacent to the navigation channel.

(b) Nonproject specific
(1) In general

The Secretary may remove and remediate contaminated sediments from the navigable waters of the United States for the purpose of environmental enhancement and water quality improvement if such removal and remediation is requested by a non-Federal sponsor and the sponsor agrees to pay 35 percent of the cost of such removal and remediation.

(2) Maximum amount

The Secretary may not expend more than $50,000,000 in a fiscal year to carry out this subsection.

(c) Joint plan requirement

The Secretary may only remove and remediate contaminated sediments under subsection (b) in accordance with a joint plan developed by the Secretary and interested Federal, State, and local government officials. Such plan must include an opportunity for public comment, a description of the work to be undertaken, the method to be used for dredged material disposal, the roles and responsibilities of the Secretary and non-Federal sponsors, and identification of sources of funding.

(d) Disposal costs

Costs of disposal of contaminated sediments removed under this section shall be a 1 shared as a cost of construction.

(e) Limitation on statutory construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the rights and responsibilities of any person under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 [42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.].

(f) Priority work

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give priority to work in the following areas:

(1)

Brooklyn Waterfront, New York.

(2)

Buffalo Harbor and River, New York.

(3)

Ashtabula River, Ohio.

(4)

Mahoning River, Ohio.

(5)

Lower Fox River, Wisconsin.

(6)

Passaic River and Newark Bay, New Jersey.

(7)

Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.

(8)

Willamette River, Oregon.

(g) Nonprofit entities

Notwithstanding section 1962d–5b of title 42, for any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 101–640, title III, § 312, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4639; Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 205, Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3679; Pub. L. 106–53, title II, § 224, Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 106–541, title II, § 210(a), Dec. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 2592.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-640 · 104 Stat. 4639
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-303 · 110 Stat. 3679
  • 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-53 · 113 Stat. 297
  • 2000Amended · Pub. L. 106-541 · 114 Stat. 2592

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-640 on 1990-11-28.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case