33 U.S.C. § 1298 — Cost effectiveness
submitted 78 years ago by Pub. L. 97-117 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 526 words · no verdicts yet
Federally assisted waste-treatment projects must use the most economical and cost-effective overall system over the project's life. The Administrator must make that determination before approving grants and must require value-engineering review for projects over $10 million.
(a) Policy. Congress states that a federally assisted waste-treatment or management project by a State*, municipality*, or intermunicipal or interstate agency* is an overall system. It must be the most economical and cost-effective combination, over the works' estimated life, of devices and systems for storing, treating, recycling, and reclaiming municipal sewage or liquid industrial waste to implement section 1281 or reuse water. The system includes sewers, collection, pumping and power, equipment and related items; extensions, improvements, remodeling, additions, and alterations; standby treatment and clear-well facilities for reliable recycled supply; integral land, including land storing treated wastewater before land application; residue-disposal works; water-efficiency measures; and any method or system for preventing, reducing, storing, treating, separating, or disposing of municipal waste, stormwater runoff, or industrial waste, including waste in combined systems, to meet this chapter.
(b) Grant approval. Before approving a grant for treatment works*, the Administrator must determine that the facilities plan is the most economical and cost-effective combination over the project's life, considering construction*, operation, maintenance, and replacement costs.
(c) Value engineering. Before approving a grant for treatment works projected to cost more than $10,000,000, the Administrator must require a value-engineering review. “Value engineering review” means a specialized cost-control method using a systematic, creative approach to find unnecessarily high project costs and achieve savings without reducing reliability or efficiency.
(d) Affected projects. This section applies to waste-treatment and management projects for which no treatment works, including a facilities plan, received Federal financial assistance for construction-plan and specification preparation before December 29, 1981.
It is the policy of Congress that a project for waste treatment and management undertaken with Federal financial assistance under this chapter by any State*, municipality*, or intermunicipal or interstate agency* shall be considered as an overall waste treatment system for waste treatment and management, and shall be that system which constitutes the most economical and cost-effective combination of devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature to implement section 1281 of this title, or necessary to recycle or reuse water at the most economical cost over the estimated life of the works, including intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, sewage collection systems, pumping power, and other equipment, and their appurtenances; extension, improvements, remodeling, additions, and alterations thereof; elements essential to provide a reliable recycled supply such as standby treatment units and clear well facilities; and any works, including site acquisition of the land that will be an integral part of the treatment process (including land use for the storage of treated wastewater in land treatment systems prior to land application) or which is used for ultimate disposal of residues resulting from such treatment; water efficiency measures and devices; and any other method or system for preventing, abating, reducing, storing, treating, separating, or disposing of municipal waste, including storm water runoff, or industrial waste, including waste in combined storm water and sanitary sewer systems; to meet the requirements of this chapter.
In accordance with the policy set forth in subsection (a) of this section, before the Administrator approves any grant to any State, municipality, or intermunicipal or interstate agency for the erection, building, acquisition, alteration, remodeling, improvement, or extension of any treatment works* the Administrator shall determine that the facilities plan of which such treatment works are a part constitutes the most economical and cost-effective combination of treatment works over the life of the project to meet the requirements of this chapter, including, but not limited to, consideration of construction* costs, operation, maintenance, and replacement costs.
In furtherance of the policy set forth in subsection (a) of this section, the Administrator shall require value engineering review in connection with any treatment works, prior to approval of any grant for the erection, building, acquisition, alteration, remodeling, improvement, or extension of such treatment works, in any case in which the cost of such erection, building, acquisition, alteration, remodeling, improvement, or extension is projected to be in excess of $10,000,000. For purposes of this subsection, the term “value engineering review” means a specialized cost control technique which uses a systematic and creative approach to identify and to focus on unnecessarily high cost in a project in order to arrive at a cost saving without sacrificing the reliability or efficiency of the project.
This section applies to projects for waste treatment and management for which no treatment works including a facilities plan for such project have received Federal financial assistance for the preparation of construction plans and specifications under this chapter before December 29, 1981.
Source credit: (June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, § 218, as added Pub. L. 97–117, § 19, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1630.)
- 1948Enacted · Pub. L. 97-117 · 95 Stat. 1630
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 97-117 on 1948-06-30.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case