ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 2242 — Remote and subsistence harbors

submitted 19 years ago by Pub. L. 110-114 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 462 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

For certain remote jurisdictions and subsistence communities, the Secretary may recommend harbor projects without relying only on national economic-development benefits. The Secretary must consider specified community, safety, subsistence, economic, welfare, social, and cultural benefits.

(a) When studying harbor and navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without showing that it is justified solely by national economic-development benefits if the project is in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa, and (1) over 80% of goods transported through it will be consumed in the United States, based on the Secretary’s determination and non-Federal information, or (2) without it, the long-term viability of its community or a served regional community that will rely on it would be threatened. (b) The Secretary must consider benefits to (1) local and served-region public health and safety, including access to protective facilities; (2) subsistence access to natural resources; (3) local and regional economic opportunities; (4) served regional population welfare; and (5) local and served-region social and cultural value. (c) These projects receive the same budget consideration and priority as projects recommended solely for national economic-development benefits. (d)(1) The Secretary may carry out a studied project under the criteria for projects authorized under section 577. (2) In evaluating and implementing it, the Secretary must allow a non-Federal interest to finance it under the flood-control criteria in section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (e) If a project cannot be carried out under (d), after finding it feasible under (a), the Secretary may recommend it in the annual report under section 2282d.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

In conducting a study of harbor and navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic development benefits if the Secretary determines that—

(1)

the project would be located in the State of Hawaii or Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa; and

(2)
(A)

over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the United States, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest; or

(B)

the long-term viability of the community in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project, would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.

(b) Justification

In considering whether to recommend a project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the project to any of—

(1)

public health and safety of the local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project, including access to facilities designed to protect public health and safety;

(2)

access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;

(3)

local and regional economic opportunities;

(4)

welfare of the regional population to be served by the project; or

(5)

social and cultural value to the local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project.

(c) Prioritization

Projects recommended by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall be given equivalent budget consideration and priority as projects recommended solely by national economic development benefits.

(d) Disposition
(1) In general

The Secretary may carry out any project identified in the study carried out pursuant to subsection (a) in accordance with the criteria for projects carried out under the authority of the Secretary under section 577 of this title.

(2) Non-Federal interests

In evaluating and implementing a project under this section, the Secretary shall allow a non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of a project in accordance with the criteria established for flood control projects under section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4184).

(e) Annual report

For a project that cannot be carried out under the authority specified in subsection (d), on a determination by the Secretary of the feasibility of the project under subsection (a), the Secretary may include a recommendation concerning the project in the annual report submitted to Congress under section 2282d of this title.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2006, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1073; Pub. L. 113–121, title II, § 2104, June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, § 1105, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 118–272, div. A, title I, § 1147, Jan. 4, 2025, 138 Stat. 3038.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2007Enacted · Pub. L. 110-114 · 121 Stat. 1073
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-121 · 128 Stat. 1279
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-322 · 130 Stat. 1633
  • 2025Amended · Pub. L. 118-272 · 138 Stat. 3038

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 110-114 on 2007-11-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case