ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 2735 — Equipment and personnel requirements under tank vessel and facility response plans

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-380 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 299 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Certain tanker and facility oil-spill response plans must include equipment, trained personnel, local training, exercises, and equipment testing in Prince William Sound. The section defines “Prince William Sound” and “worst case discharge.”

(a) In addition to 33 U.S.C. § 1321(j) vessel-plan requirements, a response plan for a tanker loading at a facility permitted under the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, and the facility’s plan, must provide for: (1) prepositioned containment and removal equipment in communities and strategic places within Prince William Sound, including skimming escort vessels, oil-receiving barges, heavy-duty boom, pumping, transferring, and lightering equipment, and other appropriate equipment protecting the environment, including fish hatcheries; (2) an oil-spill removal organization at appropriate locations with enough trained people to immediately remove, as far as practicable, a worst-case discharge or 200,000 barrels, whichever is greater; (3) oil-removal training for local residents and people cultivating or producing fish or fish products there; (4) exercises at least twice a year testing required equipment and personnel; and (5) periodic testing and certification of required equipment as the Secretary requires. (b) Definitions. (1) “Prince William Sound” means all Alaska State and Federal waters within Prince William Sound, including the approach to Hinchenbrook Entrance out to and including Seal Rocks. (2) “Worst case discharge” means, for a vessel, its entire cargo discharged in adverse weather, and for a facility, the largest foreseeable discharge in adverse weather.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

In addition to the requirements for response plans for vessels established by section 1321(j) of this title, a response plan for a tanker loading cargo at a facility permitted under the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), and a response plan for such a facility, shall provide for—

(1)

prepositioned oil spill containment and removal equipment in communities and other strategic locations within the geographic boundaries of Prince William Sound, including escort vessels with skimming capability; barges to receive recovered oil; heavy duty sea boom, pumping, transferring, and lightering equipment; and other appropriate removal equipment for the protection of the environment, including fish hatcheries;

(2)

the establishment of an oil spill removal organization at appropriate locations in Prince William Sound, consisting of trained personnel in sufficient numbers to immediately remove, to the maximum extent practicable, a worst case discharge or a discharge of 200,000 barrels of oil, whichever is greater;

(3)

training in oil removal techniques for local residents and individuals engaged in the cultivation or production of fish or fish products in Prince William Sound;

(4)

practice exercises not less than 2 times per year which test the capacity of the equipment and personnel required under this paragraph; and

(5)

periodic testing and certification of equipment required under this paragraph, as required by the Secretary.

(b) Definitions

In this section—

(1)

the term “Prince William Sound” means all State and Federal waters within Prince William Sound, Alaska, including the approach to Hinchenbrook Entrance out to and encompassing Seal Rocks; and

(2)

the term “worst case discharge” means—

(A)

in the case of a vessel, a discharge in adverse weather conditions of its entire cargo; and

(B)

in the case of a facility, the largest foreseeable discharge in adverse weather conditions.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 101–380, title V, § 5005, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 553; Pub. L. 102–388, title III, § 354, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1555.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-380 · 104 Stat. 553
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-388 · 106 Stat. 1555

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-380 on 1990-08-18.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case