ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 394Challenge to jurors

submitted date unrecorded by Congress to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 40 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law gives both sides three automatic juror strikes in certain jury trials. The United States and the accused each get three peremptory challenges. Challenges based on a specific reason are decided by the judge alone.

This section applies to jury trials in "summary cases" — minor cases handled through a simplified process. Both the United States and the accused person get three peremptory challenges each, meaning each side can remove up to three potential jurors without giving a reason. Separately, "challenges for cause" — objecting to a juror for a specific reason, like bias — are decided by the judge alone. Some court systems use a separate panel of "triers" to decide these challenges; this section says that will not happen here.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

At the trial in summary cases, if by jury, the United States and the accused shall each be entitled to three peremptory challenges. Challenges for cause, in such cases, shall be tried by the court without the aid of triers.

Source credit: (R.S. § 4303.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

A history note hasn’t been published yet.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case