33 U.S.C. § 426c — Report by Coastal Engineering Research Center

submitted 81 years ago by ch. 334 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 85 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Coastal Engineering Research Center must state its opinion in every shore-protection report it makes under section 426. It must say whether the project is worth adopting, whether there is public interest in it, and what share the United States should pay.

When the Coastal Engineering Research Center writes a report on a cooperative shore-protection investigation or study done under section 426, it must — in addition to anything else the report is required to cover — state its opinion on three things: (a) whether the project is worth adopting; (b) whether there is any public interest in the proposed improvement, and if so, what that interest is; and (c) what share of the cost, if any, the United States should pay.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Coastal Engineering Research Center, in making its report on any cooperative investigation and studies under the provisions of section 426 of this title, relating to shore protection work shall, in addition to any other matters upon which it may be required to report, state its opinion as to (a) the advisability of adopting the project; (b) what public interest, if any, is involved in the proposed improvement; and (c) what share of the expense, if any, should be borne by the United States.

Source credit: (July 31, 1945, ch. 334, § 3, 59 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 88–172, § 1, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

1945Enacted · Act of July 31, 1945, ch. 334 · 59 Stat. 508
1963Amended · Pub. L. 88-172 · 77 Stat. 304

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 334 on 1945-07-31.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case