ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 476Restrictions on tanker traffic in Puget Sound and adjacent waters

submitted 49 years ago by Pub. L. 95-136 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 224 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress found that Puget Sound's waters and nearby shores are a valuable but fragile national resource. Growing oil tanker traffic there raises the risk of collisions and spills. Since October 18, 1977, no federal official may approve building or changing a dock or terminal in Puget Sound (or nearby Washington waters) if it would let more crude oil pass through than before, except oil refined for use within Washington State.

(a) Congress makes three findings: the navigable waters of Puget Sound in Washington State, and the natural resources there, are a fragile and important national asset; Puget Sound and its nearby shore are threatened by growing tanker traffic carrying crude oil, which raises the risk of ship collisions and oil spills; and it is necessary to limit this tanker traffic to protect Puget Sound's waters, its natural resources, and the nearby shore from environmental harm. (b) Starting October 18, 1977, no federal officer, employee, or official may issue, renew, grant, or approve any permit, license, or other authority to build, renovate, modify, or otherwise change a terminal, dock, or other facility in, on, or next to (or affecting) the navigable waters of Puget Sound, or any other navigable waters in Washington State east of Port Angeles, if doing so would or could increase the amount of crude oil that facility can handle beyond what it could handle as of October 18, 1977. The one exception is oil that will be refined for use within Washington State.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The Congress finds that—

(1)

the navigable waters of Puget Sound in the State of Washington, and the natural resources therein, are a fragile and important national asset;

(2)

Puget Sound and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto is threatened by increased domestic and international traffic of tankers carrying crude oil in bulk which increases the possibility of vessel collisions and oil spills; and

(3)

it is necessary to restrict such tanker traffic in Puget Sound in order to protect the navigable waters thereof, the natural resources therein, and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto, from environmental harm.

(b)

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after October 18, 1977, no officer, employee, or other official of the Federal Government shall, or shall have authority to, issue, renew, grant, or otherwise approve any permit, license, or other authority for constructing, renovating, modifying, or otherwise altering a terminal, dock, or other facility in, on, or immediately adjacent to, or affecting the navigable waters of Puget Sound, or any other navigable waters in the State of Washington east of Port Angeles, which will or may result in any increase in the volume of crude oil capable of being handled at any such facility (measured as of October 18, 1977), other than oil to be refined for consumption in the State of Washington.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–136, § 5, Oct. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1168.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1977Enacted · Pub. L. 95-136 · 91 Stat. 1168

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-136 on 1977-10-18.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case