ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

34 U.S.C. § 10282 — Limitations on benefits

submitted 42 years ago by Pub. L. 90-351 to r/title-34-CRIME-CONTROL-AND-LAW-ENFORCEMENT · 180 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section lists limits on benefits and directs the Bureau how to apply those limits. It requires a presumption against applying a limit unless clear and convincing evidence supports it.

(a) In general No benefit must be paid under this subchapter—
(1) if the fatal or catastrophic injury was caused by the intentional misconduct of the public safety officer or by such officer’s intention to bring about his death, disability, or injury;
(2) if the public safety officer was voluntarily intoxicated at the time of his fatal or catastrophic injury;
(3) if the public safety officer was performing his duties in a grossly negligent manner at the time of his fatal or catastrophic injury;
(4) to any individual who would otherwise be entitled to a benefit under this subchapter if such individual’s actions were a substantial contributing factor to the fatal or catastrophic injury of the public safety officer; or
(5) about any individual employed in a capacity other than a civilian capacity.

(b) Presumption In determining whether a benefit is payable under this subchapter, the Bureau—
(1) must presume that none of the limitations described in subsection

(a) apply; and
(2) must not determine that a limitation described in subsection

(a) applies, absent clear and convincing evidence.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

No benefit shall be paid under this subchapter—

(1)

if the fatal or catastrophic injury was caused by the intentional misconduct of the public safety officer or by such officer’s intention to bring about his death, disability, or injury;

(2)

if the public safety officer was voluntarily intoxicated at the time of his fatal or catastrophic injury;

(3)

if the public safety officer was performing his duties in a grossly negligent manner at the time of his fatal or catastrophic injury;

(4)

to any individual who would otherwise be entitled to a benefit under this subchapter if such individual’s actions were a substantial contributing factor to the fatal or catastrophic injury of the public safety officer; or

(5)

with respect to any individual employed in a capacity other than a civilian capacity.

(b) Presumption

In determining whether a benefit is payable under this subchapter, the Bureau—

(1)

shall presume that none of the limitations described in subsection (a) apply; and

(2)

shall not determine that a limitation described in subsection (a) applies, absent clear and convincing evidence.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–351, title I, § 1202, as added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 609F, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2099; amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XIII, § 1301(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4834; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1164(b), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3120; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1086(b)(1)(C), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1966; Pub. L. 115–36, § 5, June 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 852.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1984Enacted · Pub. L. 90-351 · 98 Stat. 2099
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-647 · 104 Stat. 4834
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-162 · 119 Stat. 3120
  • 2013Amended · Pub. L. 112-239 · 126 Stat. 1966
  • 2017Amended · Pub. L. 115-36 · 131 Stat. 852

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-351 on 1984-10-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case