35 U.S.C. § 121 — Divisional applications
submitted 74 years ago by ch. 950 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 169 words · no verdicts yet
If a patent application claims two separate inventions, the office can require a split. The second invention can become its own 'divisional' application, keeping the original filing date. One filed application can't later be used against the other in court.
If two or more independent and distinct inventions are claimed in one application, the Director may require the application to be restricted to one of the inventions. If the other invention* is made the subject of a divisional application which complies with the requirements of section 120 it shall be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the original application. A patent issuing on an application with respect to which a requirement for restriction under this section has been made, or on an application filed as a result of such a requirement, shall not be used as a reference either in the Patent and Trademark Office or in the courts against a divisional application or against the original application or any patent issued on either of them, if the divisional application is filed before the issuance of the patent on the other application. The validity of a patent shall not be questioned for failure of the Director to require the application to be restricted to one invention.
Source credit: (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 800; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 4(a)(2), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 295, 335.)
- 1952Enacted · Act of July 19, 1952, ch. 950 · 66 Stat. 800
- 1975Amended · Pub. L. 93-596 · 88 Stat. 1949
- 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-113 · 113 Stat. 1536, 1501
- 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-273 · 116 Stat. 1906
- 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 295, 335
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 950 on 1952-07-19.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case