ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

35 U.S.C. § 156Extension of patent term

submitted 42 years ago by Pub. L. 98-417 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 4,365 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law lets patent owners get extra years when government safety review delayed selling their product. The owner must apply and meet strict rules to qualify. The extra time is capped, usually five years, and total life cannot exceed fourteen years past approval.

(a) Basic eligibility. The term of a patent that claims a product, a method of using a product, or a method of making a product can be extended. The extension is measured from the patent's original expiration date, which includes any patent term adjustment already granted. To qualify, all of the following must be true: the patent has not already expired when someone applies for the extension; the patent has never been extended under subsection (e)(1) before; the patent's owner (or an agent) applies, following the rules in subsection (d)(1) through (4); and the product went through a "regulatory review period" before it could be sold or used commercially. On top of that, the permission to sell or use the product after that review must generally be the very first time that product was allowed on the market under the law that required the review. There are two special situations: if the patent covers a manufacturing method that mainly uses recombinant DNA technology, "first" means the first time a product made by that patented process was allowed on the market; and for a patent on a new animal drug or veterinary biological product that already covers non-food animals and later gets approved for food-producing animals, "first" means the first approval for food-producing animals — as long as the patent was not already extended based on the non-food-animal approval. The approved product involved is called the "approved product" for the rest of the section. (b) What the extension covers. Except as provided in subsection (d)(5)(F), during the extended period the patent owner's rights are limited. If the patent covers a product, the rights only cover uses of that product approved before the patent's original expiration (under the review law, or under related reviews described in subsection (g)) and also approved on or after the date the regulatory review period ended. If the patent covers a method of using a product, the rights only cover the specific approved use the patent claims, under the same before-and-after timing rule. If the patent covers a method of manufacturing, the rights are limited to the manufacturing method as actually used to make the approved product, or a product that went through a related regulatory review described in subsection (g). "Product," in this subsection, includes the approved product. (c) How the extra time is calculated. The extension equals the part of the regulatory review period that happened after the patent was issued, with adjustments. First, subtract any time the applicant did not act with "due diligence" during the review period. Second, after that subtraction, count only half of the time remaining in certain early, pre-application portions of the review period listed in subsection (g). Third, add the time left in the patent term after approval to this adjusted extension; if the total is more than fourteen years, shorten the extension so the combined total does not exceed fourteen years. Fourth, no product can have more than one patent extended under subsection (e)(1) for the same regulatory review period. (d) Applying for an extension. The patent owner or agent applies to the Director. The application generally must be filed within 60 days after the product gets permission for commercial marketing or use, with a special rule in subsection (i) for certain drug products and exceptions in paragraph (5) for interim extensions. The application must include the approved product's identity and which federal law triggered the review; which patent and which specific claims are involved; information the Director needs to decide eligibility and what rights the extension will cover, plus information regulators need to calculate the length of review; a description of what the applicant did during the review period and the key dates; and any other information the Director requires. If permission to market is granted after 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, or on a non-business day, it counts as received the next business day (Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Within 60 days of an application, the Director notifies the Secretary of Agriculture, if the review involves the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act, or the Secretary of Health and Human Services for other drugs, devices, or additives under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and sends that Secretary a copy. Within 30 days of getting the application, that Secretary reviews the dates, determines the length of the regulatory review period, tells the Director, and publishes the determination in the Federal Register. If someone petitions within 180 days of that published determination, claiming the applicant did not act with due diligence, the Secretary must decide the question within 90 days of the petition, following that Secretary's own regulations. For certain drug reviews this decision-making power cannot be delegated below the Office of the Director of Food and Drugs; for Virus-Serum-Toxin Act products it cannot go below the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Marketing and Inspection Services. The Secretary publishes this due-diligence decision too, with the reasoning. Anyone interested can ask, within 60 days of publication, for an informal hearing; if requested, the hearing happens within 30 days, or 60 days if the requester asks for more time, with notice to the patent owner and other interested people. Within 30 days after the hearing, the Secretary affirms or revises the determination and publishes any change. "Due diligence" means the level of attention, steady effort, and promptness that people normally show during a regulatory review period. Every extension application must follow disclosure rules the Director sets. Interim extensions: if the owner reasonably expects the regulatory review to run past the current patent's expiration, the owner can apply for a temporary "interim" extension between 6 months and 15 days before the patent expires. This application needs similar information: what is under review and under what law; which patent and claims; eligibility information; what has been done so far and the key dates; and anything else the Director requires. If the Director finds the patent would qualify for a full extension except that marketing permission has not been granted yet, the Director publishes that finding and issues an interim extension certificate lasting up to one year. The owner can apply for up to four more interim extensions this way, only one more if a special rule in subsection (g)(6)(C) applies, each application filed between 60 and 30 days before the current interim extension expires. Each interim certificate becomes part of the official patent record. An interim extension ends 60 days after the product finally gets marketing permission, unless within those 60 days the applicant tells the Director and submits the rest of the required information — in which case the patent gets the full extension described elsewhere in this section, for up to 5 years past the original expiration, or, in the special case under subsection (g)(6)(C), measured from the approval date. During an interim extension, the owner's rights are limited to whatever is currently under regulatory review: the product itself, the specific claimed use, or the manufacturing method, depending on the kind of patent. (e) Deciding and certifying extensions. The Director can decide a patent is eligible based only on what the application says. If the Director finds the patent eligible and finds the requirements in subsection (d)(1) through (4) satisfied, the Director issues a certificate of extension for the period figured out under subsection (c). This certificate becomes part of the official patent record. If a patent's term would run out before the Director decides on the extension application, the Director can extend the term, for up to a year at a time, until the decision is made — but only if the Director believes the patent is eligible. (f) Key definitions. "Product" means a drug product, or a medical device, food additive, or color additive regulated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. "Drug product" means the active ingredient in a new drug, antibiotic, or human biological product, or in a new animal drug or veterinary biological product not mainly made using recombinant DNA or RNA, hybridoma, or similar genetic-engineering methods, including any salt or ester form, alone or combined with another active ingredient. A "major health or environmental effects test" is a test that reasonably evaluates a product's health or environmental effects, takes at least six months to run, not counting time spent analyzing results afterward, and whose data gets submitted for marketing permission. References to "section 351" mean that section of the Public Health Service Act; references to sections 503, 505, 512, or 515 mean those sections of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and "Virus-Serum-Toxin Act" means the 1913 law found at 21 U.S.C. 151–158. "Informal hearing" has the meaning given in section 201(y) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. "Patent" means one issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "Date of enactment" means September 24, 1984, for human drugs, devices, or additives, and the enactment date of the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act for animal drugs or veterinary biological products. (g) What counts as the "regulatory review period." This depends on the product type. For a new drug, antibiotic, or human biological product: the time from when a testing exemption took effect until the marketing application was first submitted, plus the time from that submission until the application was approved. For a food or color additive: the time from starting a major health or environmental test until a petition was first filed requesting approval to use the additive, plus the time from that petition until the rule allowing the additive took effect, or, if there were objections, until they were resolved and marketing was allowed. For a medical device: the time from starting a human clinical investigation until an application was first submitted, plus the time until that application was approved, or, for devices reviewed under a product development protocol, the time from submitting a completion notice until the protocol was declared complete. For a new animal drug: the time from starting a major health or environmental test, or an exemption taking effect, whichever is earlier, until the application was first submitted, plus the time until the application was approved. For a veterinary biological product: the time from when authority to prepare an experimental version took effect until a license application was submitted, plus the time until the license was issued. Each of these periods is capped. If the patent was issued after this section's enactment date, the extension based on the review period cannot exceed five years. If the patent was issued before enactment and none of the early review steps — testing, exemption requests, petitions — had started yet as of enactment, the cap is also five years. But if the patent was issued before enactment and an early review step had already started before enactment, while marketing approval still had not happened, the cap drops to two years, or three years for new animal drugs or veterinary biological products. (h) Fees. The Director may set fees to cover the Patent Office's cost of handling applications under this section. (i) Special rule for controlled substances. If the Secretary of Health and Human Services tells an applicant that a drug's approval, conditional approval, or indexing will lead to a recommendation to control it under the Controlled Substances Act, then starting on the "covered date," the drug is treated as approved or indexed under the relevant law and as having permission for commercial marketing. The "covered date" is whichever of these happens last: the date an application is approved under specific Public Health Service Act or Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act provisions; the date an application is conditionally approved; the date a request for indexing is granted; or the date the interim final rule controlling the drug is issued under the Controlled Substances Act.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The term of a patent which claims a product, a method of using a product, or a method of manufacturing a product shall be extended in accordance with this section from the original expiration date of the patent, which shall include any patent term adjustment granted under section 154(b), if—

(1)

the term of the patent has not expired before an application is submitted under subsection (d)(1) for its extension;

(2)

the term of the patent has never been extended under subsection (e)(1) of this section;

(3)

an application for extension is submitted by the owner of record of the patent or its agent and in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (d);

(4)

the product has been subject to a regulatory review period before its commercial marketing or use;

(5)
(A)

except as provided in subparagraph (B) or (C), the permission for the commercial marketing or use of the product after such regulatory review period is the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product under the provision of law under which such regulatory review period occurred;

(B)

in the case of a patent which claims a method of manufacturing the product which primarily uses recombinant DNA technology in the manufacture of the product, the permission for the commercial marketing or use of the product after such regulatory review period is the first permitted commercial marketing or use of a product manufactured under the process claimed in the patent; or

(C)

for purposes of subparagraph (A), in the case of a patent which—

(i)

claims a new animal drug or a veterinary biological product which (I) is not covered by the claims in any other patent which has been extended, and (II) has received permission for the commercial marketing or use in non-food-producing animals and in food-producing animals, and

(ii)

was not extended on the basis of the regulatory review period for use in non-food-producing animals,

the permission for the commercial marketing or use of the drug or product after the regulatory review period for use in food-producing animals is the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the drug or product for administration to a food-producing animal.

The product referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5) is hereinafter in this section referred to as the “approved product”.

(b)

Except as provided in subsection (d)(5)(F), the rights derived from any patent the term of which is extended under this section shall during the period during which the term of the patent is extended—

(1)

in the case of a patent which claims a product, be limited to any use approved for the product—

(A)

before the expiration of the term of the patent—

(i)

under the provision of law under which the applicable regulatory review occurred, or

(ii)

under the provision of law under which any regulatory review described in paragraph (1), (4), or (5) of subsection (g) occurred, and

(B)

on or after the expiration of the regulatory review period upon which the extension of the patent was based;

(2)

in the case of a patent which claims a method of using a product, be limited to any use claimed by the patent and approved for the product—

(A)

before the expiration of the term of the patent—

(i)

under any provision of law under which an applicable regulatory review occurred, and

(ii)

under the provision of law under which any regulatory review described in paragraph (1), (4), or (5) of subsection (g) occurred, and

(B)

on or after the expiration of the regulatory review period upon which the extension of the patent was based; and

(3)

in the case of a patent which claims a method of manufacturing a product, be limited to the method of manufacturing as used to make—

(A)

the approved product, or

(B)

the product if it has been subject to a regulatory review period described in paragraph (1), (4), or (5) of subsection (g).

As used in this subsection, the term “product” includes an approved product.

(c)

The term of a patent eligible for extension under subsection (a) shall be extended by the time equal to the regulatory review period for the approved product which period occurs after the date the patent is issued, except that—

(1)

each period of the regulatory review period shall be reduced by any period determined under subsection (d)(2)(B) during which the applicant for the patent extension did not act with due diligence during such period of the regulatory review period;

(2)

after any reduction required by paragraph (1), the period of extension shall include only one-half of the time remaining in the periods described in paragraphs (1)(B)(i), (2)(B)(i), (3)(B)(i), (4)(B)(i), and (5)(B)(i) of subsection (g);

(3)

if the period remaining in the term of a patent after the date of the approval of the approved product under the provision of law under which such regulatory review occurred when added to the regulatory review period as revised under paragraphs (1) and (2) exceeds fourteen years, the period of extension shall be reduced so that the total of both such periods does not exceed fourteen years; and

(4)

in no event shall more than one patent be extended under subsection (e)(1) for the same regulatory review period for any product.

(d)
(1)

To obtain an extension of the term of a patent under this section, the owner of record of the patent or its agent shall submit an application to the Director. Except as provided in paragraph (5), such an application may only be submitted within the sixty-day period beginning on the date the product received permission under the provision of law under which the applicable regulatory review period occurred for commercial marketing or use, or in the case of a drug product described in subsection (i), within the sixty-day period beginning on the covered date (as defined in subsection (i)). The application shall contain—

(A)

the identity of the approved product and the Federal statute under which regulatory review occurred;

(B)

the identity of the patent for which an extension is being sought and the identity of each claim of such patent which claims the approved product or a method of using or manufacturing the approved product;

(C)

information to enable the Director to determine under subsections (a) and (b) the eligibility of a patent for extension and the rights that will be derived from the extension and information to enable the Director and the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Secretary of Agriculture to determine the period of the extension under subsection (g);

(D)

a brief description of the activities undertaken by the applicant during the applicable regulatory review period with respect to the approved product and the significant dates applicable to such activities; and

(E)

such patent or other information as the Director may require.

For purposes of determining the date on which a product receives permission under the second sentence of this paragraph, if such permission is transmitted after 4:30 P.M., Eastern Time, on a business day, or is transmitted on a day that is not a business day, the product shall be deemed to receive such permission on the next business day. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “business day” means any Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday, excluding any legal holiday under section 6103 of title 5.

(2)
(A)

Within 60 days of the submittal of an application for extension of the term of a patent under paragraph (1), the Director shall notify—

(i)

the Secretary of Agriculture if the patent claims a drug product or a method of using or manufacturing a drug product and the drug product is subject to the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act, and

(ii)

the Secretary of Health and Human Services if the patent claims any other drug product, a medical device, or a food additive or color additive or a method of using or manufacturing such a product, device, or additive and if the product, device, and additive are subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,

of the extension application and shall submit to the Secretary who is so notified a copy of the application. Not later than 30 days after the receipt of an application from the Director, the Secretary receiving the application shall review the dates contained in the application pursuant to paragraph (1)(C) and determine the applicable regulatory review period, shall notify the Director of the determination, and shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of such determination.

(B)
(i)

If a petition is submitted to the Secretary making the determination under subparagraph (A), not later than 180 days after the publication of the determination under subparagraph (A), upon which it may reasonably be determined that the applicant did not act with due diligence during the applicable regulatory review period, the Secretary making the determination shall, in accordance with regulations promulgated by such Secretary, determine if the applicant acted with due diligence during the applicable regulatory review period. The Secretary making the determination shall make such determination not later than 90 days after the receipt of such a petition. For a drug product, device, or additive subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or the Public Health Service Act, the Secretary may not delegate the authority to make the determination prescribed by this clause to an office below the Office of the Director 1 of Food and Drugs. For a product subject to the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act, the Secretary of Agriculture may not delegate the authority to make the determination prescribed by this clause to an office below the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Marketing and Inspection Services.

(ii)

The Secretary making a determination under clause (i) shall notify the Director of the determination and shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of such determination together with the factual and legal basis for such determination. Any interested person may request, within the 60-day period beginning on the publication of a determination, the Secretary making the determination to hold an informal hearing on the determination. If such a request is made within such period, such Secretary shall hold such hearing not later than 30 days after the date of the request, or at the request of the person making the request, not later than 60 days after such date. The Secretary who is holding the hearing shall provide notice of the hearing to the owner of the patent involved and to any interested person and provide the owner and any interested person an opportunity to participate in the hearing. Within 30 days after the completion of the hearing, such Secretary shall affirm or revise the determination which was the subject of the hearing and shall notify the Director of any revision of the determination and shall publish any such revision in the Federal Register.

(3)

For the purposes of paragraph (2)(B), the term “due diligence” means that degree of attention, continuous directed effort, and timeliness as may reasonably be expected from, and are ordinarily exercised by, a person during a regulatory review period.

(4)

An application for the extension of the term of a patent is subject to the disclosure requirements prescribed by the Director.

(5)
(A)

If the owner of record of the patent or its agent reasonably expects that the applicable regulatory review period described in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), (2)(B)(ii), (3)(B)(ii), (4)(B)(ii), or (5)(B)(ii) of subsection (g) that began for a product that is the subject of such patent may extend beyond the expiration of the patent term in effect, the owner or its agent may submit an application to the Director for an interim extension during the period beginning 6 months, and ending 15 days, before such term is due to expire. The application shall contain—

(i)

the identity of the product subject to regulatory review and the Federal statute under which such review is occurring;

(ii)

the identity of the patent for which interim extension is being sought and the identity of each claim of such patent which claims the product under regulatory review or a method of using or manufacturing the product;

(iii)

information to enable the Director to determine under subsection (a)(1), (2), and (3) the eligibility of a patent for extension;

(iv)

a brief description of the activities undertaken by the applicant during the applicable regulatory review period to date with respect to the product under review and the significant dates applicable to such activities; and

(v)

such patent or other information as the Director may require.

(B)

If the Director determines that, except for permission to market or use the product commercially, the patent would be eligible for an extension of the patent term under this section, the Director shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of such determination, including the identity of the product under regulatory review, and shall issue to the applicant a certificate of interim extension for a period of not more than 1 year.

(C)

The owner of record of a patent, or its agent, for which an interim extension has been granted under subparagraph (B), may apply for not more than 4 subsequent interim extensions under this paragraph, except that, in the case of a patent subject to subsection (g)(6)(C), the owner of record of the patent, or its agent, may apply for only 1 subsequent interim extension under this paragraph. Each such subsequent application shall be made during the period beginning 60 days before, and ending 30 days before, the expiration of the preceding interim extension.

(D)

Each certificate of interim extension under this paragraph shall be recorded in the official file of the patent and shall be considered part of the original patent.

(E)

Any interim extension granted under this paragraph shall terminate at the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the product involved receives permission for commercial marketing or use, except that, if within that 60-day period the applicant notifies the Director of such permission and submits any additional information under paragraph (1) of this subsection not previously contained in the application for interim extension, the patent shall be further extended, in accordance with the provisions of this section—

(i)

for not to exceed 5 years from the date of expiration of the original patent term; or

(ii)

if the patent is subject to subsection (g)(6)(C), from the date on which the product involved receives approval for commercial marketing or use.

(F)

The rights derived from any patent the term of which is extended under this paragraph shall, during the period of interim extension—

(i)

in the case of a patent which claims a product, be limited to any use then under regulatory review;

(ii)

in the case of a patent which claims a method of using a product, be limited to any use claimed by the patent then under regulatory review; and

(iii)

in the case of a patent which claims a method of manufacturing a product, be limited to the method of manufacturing as used to make the product then under regulatory review.

(e)
(1)

A determination that a patent is eligible for extension may be made by the Director solely on the basis of the representations contained in the application for the extension. If the Director determines that a patent is eligible for extension under subsection (a) and that the requirements of paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (d) have been complied with, the Director shall issue to the applicant for the extension of the term of the patent a certificate of extension, under seal, for the period prescribed by subsection (c). Such certificate shall be recorded in the official file of the patent and shall be considered as part of the original patent.

(2)

If the term of a patent for which an application has been submitted under subsection (d)(1) would expire before a certificate of extension is issued or denied under paragraph (1) respecting the application, the Director shall extend, until such determination is made, the term of the patent for periods of up to one year if he determines that the patent is eligible for extension.

(f)

For purposes of this section:

(1)

The term “product” means:

(A)

A drug product.

(B)

Any medical device, food additive, or color additive subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

(2)

The term “drug product” means the active ingredient of—

(A)

a new drug, antibiotic drug, or human biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act), or

(B)

a new animal drug or veterinary biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act) which is not primarily manufactured using recombinant DNA, recombinant RNA, hybridoma technology, or other processes involving site specific genetic manipulation techniques,

including any salt or ester of the active ingredient, as a single entity or in combination with another active ingredient.

(3)

The term “major health or environmental effects test” means a test which is reasonably related to the evaluation of the health or environmental effects of a product, which requires at least six months to conduct, and the data from which is submitted to receive permission for commercial marketing or use. Periods of analysis or evaluation of test results are not to be included in determining if the conduct of a test required at least six months.

(4)
(A)

Any reference to section 351 is a reference to section 351 of the Public Health Service Act.

(B)

Any reference to section 503, 505, 512, or 515 is a reference to section 503, 505, 512, or 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

(C)

Any reference to the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act is a reference to the Act of March 4, 1913 (21 U.S.C. 151–158).

(5)

The term “informal hearing” has the meaning prescribed for such term by section 201(y) 2 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

(6)

The term “patent” means a patent issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

(7)

The term “date of enactment” as used in this section means September 24, 1984, for a human drug product, a medical device, food additive, or color additive.

(8)

The term “date of enactment” as used in this section means the date of enactment of the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act for an animal drug or a veterinary biological product.

(g)

For purposes of this section, the term “regulatory review period” has the following meanings:

(1)
(A)

In the case of a product which is a new drug, antibiotic drug, or human biological product, the term means the period described in subparagraph (B) to which the limitation described in paragraph (6) applies.

(B)

The regulatory review period for a new drug, antibiotic drug, or human biological product is the sum of—

(i)

the period beginning on the date an exemption under subsection (i) of section 505 or subsection (d) of section 5072 became effective for the approved product and ending on the date an application was initially submitted for such drug product under section 351, 505, or 507,2 and

(ii)

the period beginning on the date the application was initially submitted for the approved product under section 351, subsection (b) of section 505, or section 5072 and ending on the date such application was approved under such section.

(2)
(A)

In the case of a product which is a food additive or color additive, the term means the period described in subparagraph (B) to which the limitation described in paragraph (6) applies.

(B)

The regulatory review period for a food or color additive is the sum of—

(i)

the period beginning on the date a major health or environmental effects test on the additive was initiated and ending on the date a petition was initially submitted with respect to the product under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requesting the issuance of a regulation for use of the product, and

(ii)

the period beginning on the date a petition was initially submitted with respect to the product under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requesting the issuance of a regulation for use of the product, and ending on the date such regulation became effective or, if objections were filed to such regulation, ending on the date such objections were resolved and commercial marketing was permitted or, if commercial marketing was permitted and later revoked pending further proceedings as a result of such objections, ending on the date such proceedings were finally resolved and commercial marketing was permitted.

(3)
(A)

In the case of a product which is a medical device, the term means the period described in subparagraph (B) to which the limitation described in paragraph (6) applies.

(B)

The regulatory review period for a medical device is the sum of—

(i)

the period beginning on the date a clinical investigation on humans involving the device was begun and ending on the date an application was initially submitted with respect to the device under section 515, and

(ii)

the period beginning on the date an application was initially submitted with respect to the device under section 515 and ending on the date such application was approved under such Act or the period beginning on the date a notice of completion of a product development protocol was initially submitted under section 515(f)(5) and ending on the date the protocol was declared completed under section 515(f)(6).

(4)
(A)

In the case of a product which is a new animal drug, the term means the period described in subparagraph (B) to which the limitation described in paragraph (6) applies.

(B)

The regulatory review period for a new animal drug product is the sum of—

(i)

the period beginning on the earlier of the date a major health or environmental effects test on the drug was initiated or the date an exemption under subsection (j) of section 512 became effective for the approved new animal drug product and ending on the date an application was initially submitted for such animal drug product under section 512, and

(ii)

the period beginning on the date the application was initially submitted for the approved animal drug product under subsection (b) of section 512 and ending on the date such application was approved under such section.

(5)
(A)

In the case of a product which is a veterinary biological product, the term means the period described in subparagraph (B) to which the limitation described in paragraph (6) applies.

(B)

The regulatory period for a veterinary biological product is the sum of—

(i)

the period beginning on the date the authority to prepare an experimental biological product under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act became effective and ending on the date an application for a license was submitted under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act, and

(ii)

the period beginning on the date an application for a license was initially submitted for approval under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act and ending on the date such license was issued.

(6)

A period determined under any of the preceding paragraphs is subject to the following limitations:

(A)

If the patent involved was issued after the date of the enactment of this section, the period of extension determined on the basis of the regulatory review period determined under any such paragraph may not exceed five years.

(B)

If the patent involved was issued before the date of the enactment of this section and—

(i)

no request for an exemption described in paragraph (1)(B) or (4)(B) was submitted and no request for the authority described in paragraph (5)(B) was submitted,

(ii)

no major health or environmental effects test described in paragraph (2)(B) or (4)(B) was initiated and no petition for a regulation or application for registration described in such paragraph was submitted, or

(iii)

no clinical investigation described in paragraph (3) was begun or product development protocol described in such paragraph was submitted,

before such date for the approved product the period of extension determined on the basis of the regulatory review period determined under any such paragraph may not exceed five years.

(C)

If the patent involved was issued before the date of the enactment of this section and if an action described in subparagraph (B) was taken before the date of the enactment of this section with respect to the approved product and the commercial marketing or use of the product has not been approved before such date, the period of extension determined on the basis of the regulatory review period determined under such paragraph may not exceed two years or in the case of an approved product which is a new animal drug or veterinary biological product (as those terms are used in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act), three years.

(h)

The Director may establish such fees as the Director determines appropriate to cover the costs to the Office of receiving and acting upon applications under this section.

(i)
(1)

For purposes of this section, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services provides notice to the sponsor of an application or request for approval, conditional approval, or indexing of a drug product for which the Secretary intends to recommend controls under the Controlled Substances Act, beginning on the covered date, the drug product shall be considered to—

(A)

have been approved or indexed under the relevant provision of the Public Health Service Act or Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and

(B)

have permission for commercial marketing or use.

(2)

In this subsection, the term “covered date” means the later of—

(A)

the date an application is approved—

(i)

under section 351(a)(2)(C) of the Public Health Service Act; or

(ii)

under section 505(b) or 512(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;

(B)

the date an application is conditionally approved under section 571(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;

(C)

the date a request for indexing is granted under section 572(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or

(D)

the date of issuance of the interim final rule controlling the drug under section 201(j) of the Controlled Substances Act.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 98–417, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 1598; amended Pub. L. 100–670, title II, § 201(a)–(h), Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3984–3987; Pub. L. 103–179, §§ 5, 6, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2040, 2042; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, § 532(c)(1), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4987; Pub. L. 105–115, title I, § 125(b)(2)(P), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2326; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4404, 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–560, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(a)(9), (b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1904, 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, § 37(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 341; Pub. L. 114–89, § 2(c), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 700.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1984Enacted · Pub. L. 98-417 · 98 Stat. 1598
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-670 · 102 Stat. 3984
  • 1993Amended · Pub. L. 103-179 · 107 Stat. 2040, 2042
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-465 · 108 Stat. 4987
  • 1997Amended · Pub. L. 105-115 · 111 Stat. 2326
  • 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-113 · 113 Stat. 1536, 1501
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-273 · 116 Stat. 1904, 1906
  • 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 341
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-89 · 129 Stat. 700

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 98-417 on 1984-09-24.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case