ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

37 U.S.C. § 421 — Allowances: no increase while dependent is entitled to basic pay

submitted 64 years ago by Pub. L. 87-649 to r/title-37-PAY-AND-ALLOWANCES-OF-THE-UNIFORMED-SERVICES · 40 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A service member can't get an increased dependent allowance under this chapter. This applies for any period the dependent is entitled to basic pay under section 204.

A member of a uniformed service cannot receive an increased allowance under this chapter because of a dependent, for any period during which that dependent is already entitled to receive basic pay under section 204 of this title.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

A member of a uniformed service may not be paid an increased allowance under this chapter, on account of a dependent, for any period during which that dependent is entitled to basic pay under section 204 of this title.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 479, § 420; renumbered § 421, Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VI, § 611(a)(1)(A), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1093.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1962Enacted · Pub. L. 87-649 · 76 Stat. 479
  • 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-180 · 101 Stat. 1093

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 87-649 on 1962-09-07.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case