38 U.S.C. § 105 — Line of duty and misconduct
submitted 68 years ago by Pub. L. 85-857 to r/title-38-VETERANS-BENEFITS · 267 words · no verdicts yet
An injury or illness a service member gets during active military, naval, air, or space service — whether on duty or authorized leave — counts as happening "in the line of duty" and not from misconduct, unless it resulted from the person's own willful misconduct or drug or alcohol abuse. That line-of-duty status doesn't apply if the person was deserting, absent without leave, or confined for a court-martial or a felony conviction at the time. For extending education or rehabilitation benefit deadlines, chronic alcoholism's effects don't count as willful misconduct.
An injury or disease incurred during active military, naval, air, or space service* will be deemed to have been incurred in line of duty and not the result of the veteran’s own misconduct when the person on whose account benefits are claimed was, at the time the injury was suffered or disease contracted, in active military, naval, air, or space service, whether on active duty* or on authorized leave, unless such injury or disease was a result of the person’s own willful misconduct or abuse of alcohol or drugs. Venereal disease shall not be presumed to be due to willful misconduct if the person in service complies with the regulations of the appropriate service department* requiring the person to report and receive treatment for such disease.
The requirement for line of duty will not be met if it appears that at the time the injury was suffered or disease contracted the person on whose account benefits are claimed (1) was avoiding duty by deserting the service or by absenting himself or herself without leave materially interfering with the performance of military duties; (2) was confined under sentence of court-martial involving an unremitted dishonorable discharge; or (3) was confined under sentence of a civil court for a felony (as determined under the laws of the jurisdiction where the person was convicted by such court).
For the purposes of any provision relating to the extension of a delimiting period under any education-benefit or rehabilitation program administered by the Secretary*, the disabling effects of chronic alcoholism shall not be considered to be the result of willful misconduct.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1110; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, § 701(4), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3290; Pub. L. 100–689, title I, § 109, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4170; Pub. L. 101–508, title VIII, § 8052(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–351; Pub. L. 102–83, § 4(a)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 926(a)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3829.)
- 1958Enacted · Pub. L. 85-857 · 72 Stat. 1110
- 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-576 · 100 Stat. 3290
- 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-689 · 102 Stat. 4170
- 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-508 · 104 Stat. 1388
- 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-83 · 105 Stat. 403
- 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 3829
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 85-857 on 1958-09-02.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case