ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

38 U.S.C. § 3225Discharge or release under conditions which would bar the use of benefits

submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-502 to r/title-38-VETERANS-BENEFITS · 65 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section automatically disenrolls a participant discharged or released from active duty under dishonorable conditions. It requires the participant’s contributions to be refunded on the discharge or release date or within 60 days after the Secretary receives notice, whichever is later.

If a program participant is discharged or released from active duty under dishonorable conditions, the participant is automatically disenrolled. The participant’s contributions must be refunded on the discharge or release date or within 60 days after the Secretary receives notice of that discharge or release, whichever is later.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

If a participant in the program is discharged or released from active duty under dishonorable conditions, such participant is automatically disenrolled and any contributions made by such participant shall be refunded to such participant on the date of such participant’s discharge or release from active duty or within 60 days from receipt of notice by the Secretary of such discharge or release, whichever is later.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 94–502, title IV, § 404, Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2396, § 1625; amended Pub. L. 101–237, title IV, § 423(b)(1)(A), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2092; renumbered § 3225, Pub. L. 102–83, § 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-502 · 90 Stat. 2396
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-237 · 103 Stat. 2092
  • 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-83 · 105 Stat. 406

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-502 on 1976-10-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case