40 U.S.C. § 18301 — Findings and purposes
submitted 24 years ago by Pub. L. 107-217 to r/title-40-PUBLIC-BUILDINGS-PROPERTY-AND-WORKS · 346 words · no verdicts yet
Congress found that labor costs are driving up the price of public transit in the Washington, D.C. area. This chapter sets rules for arbitrators who decide labor disputes at interstate transit agencies there. The goal is to keep wage increases fair without raising costs too much for riders and taxpayers.
(a) Findings. Congress made several findings. Affordable public transportation matters a lot to the Washington area's economy, air quality, and the health of people who live there or visit. Mass transit use depends heavily on prices, and prices depend heavily on labor costs, since labor is more than two-thirds of operating costs. Labor costs for transit in the area have been rising fast, and wages and benefits for operators and mechanics are among the highest in the country. Raising fares to cover higher costs would scare away riders, which hurts the public interest in promoting transit. The governments that subsidize transit, especially the District of Columbia, can't easily absorb rising labor costs because of tight budgets. Setting mandatory standards for arbitrators who settle labor disputes at interstate compact agencies will keep wage increases reasonable and within what riders and taxpayers can afford. And federal legislation is needed, under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, to balance lowering labor costs with keeping labor peace.
(b) Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to set standards that arbitrators must follow when they resolve disputes involving interstate compact agencies in the Washington area, in order to lower the cost of running public transportation there.
Congress finds that—
affordable public transportation is essential to the economic vitality of the national capital area and is an essential component of regional efforts to improve air quality to meet environmental requirements and to improve the health of both residents of and visitors to the national capital area as well as to preserve the beauty and dignity of the Nation’s capital;
use of mass transit by both residents of and visitors to the national capital area is substantially affected by the prices charged for mass transit services, prices that are substantially affected by labor costs, since more than two-thirds of operating costs are attributable to labor costs;
labor costs incurred in providing mass transit in the national capital area have increased at an alarming rate and wages and benefits of operators and mechanics currently are among the highest in the Nation;
higher operating costs incurred for public transit in the national capital area cannot be offset by increasing costs to patrons, since this often discourages ridership and thus undermines the public interest in promoting the use of public transit;
spiraling labor costs cannot be offset by the governmental entities that are responsible for subsidy payments for public transit services since local governments generally, and the District of Columbia government in particular, are operating under severe fiscal constraints;
imposition of mandatory standards applicable to arbitrators resolving arbitration* disputes involving interstate compact agencies operating in the national capital area will ensure that wage increases are justified and do not exceed the ability of transit patrons and taxpayers to fund the increase; and
federal legislation is necessary under section 8 of Article I of the United States Constitution to balance the need to moderate and lower labor costs while maintaining industrial peace.
The purpose of this chapter is to adopt standards governing arbitration that must be applied by arbitrators resolving disputes involving interstate compact agencies operating in the national capital area in order to lower operating costs for public transportation in the Washington metropolitan area.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1291.)
- 2002Enacted · Pub. L. 107-217 · 116 Stat. 1291
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 107-217 on 2002-08-21.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case